AleksM

Basic income

114 posts in this topic

@Bodigger
No, I think a "Land Value Tax"(including the ocean, natural resources), on unimproved land. Is a way to go. Was thinking about company shares, as opposed to dividend payments as shown by the Alaskan state example. A Land Value "tax" is simpler, however.

Socialise Land, but keep improvements privately owned. The value of land is derived from the community, and not the landlord.

If the improvements are socialised as well, voluntarily, then you have communism.

Less than 1% of the population of the UK and USA own nearly half the land. Any improvements people make, are consumed as a whole by a rentier class.
 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎8‎/‎27‎/‎2019 at 1:23 PM, Revolutionary Think said:

I found that Alaska has the lowest fuel tax, in fact, it is half of what we pay here in Wisconsin.  However, fuel prices are higher in Alaska.  Sounds to me like the people, not corporations are paying for this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Taxes are forced upon people, in which, is not a good idea for the long term.  Programs are added to a government policy, never deleted.  Government takes their share......first.  Think about this......our government pays farmers to not farm.

Give people their money back and, we the people, will do a much better job on poverty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Revolutionary Think I don't think I agree with Nick on the taxes of the rich would lower unemployment.  The unemployment rate in the U.S. is at 3.6% which is less than half the rate in EU.  Did I miss something in his talk?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, Bodigger said:

@Revolutionary Think I don't think I agree with Nick on the taxes of the rich would lower unemployment.  The unemployment rate in the U.S. is at 3.6% which is less than half the rate in EU.  Did I miss something in his talk?

U.S. federal unemployment rates are notorious for underestimating true unemployment. Even if unemployment is relatively low, another concern is quality of jobs. Many jobs are minimum wage without benefits and security - and people are working 2-3 jobs to make ends meet. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Serotoninluv said:

U.S. federal unemployment rates are notorious for underestimating true unemployment. Even if unemployment is relatively low, another concern is quality of jobs. Many jobs are minimum wage without benefits and security - and people are working 2-3 jobs to make ends meet. 

I agree, I think a better measurement of employment is the total number of people employed with an averaged income.  Maybe an averaged income per job.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In Milwaukee, Wisconsin they just spent over 800 million dollars on a trolley train which goes around a two mile loop.  The Mayor and the city council said it will pay for itself with the amount of riders.  Few people are riding it and the city is hemorrhaging money to keep it going.  The Mayor and city council are proposing a 1% increase on sales tax to continue funding it, and get this......Expand.  This does nothing, in fact, it hurts the poor.

this is how I see things going with BI.  It makes people feel good about what it is intended to do.  However, when it doesn't work, they will say, "it's because we need to dump more money into the program", even if it doesn't work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now