Leo Gura

Spiral Dynamics Stage Green Examples Mega-Thread

2,023 posts in this topic

This is an interesting dynamic and a funny video: Green-centered rationalist-materalist reacts to Green post-rationalism/spirituality. This shows the nuances within Green:

Notice how often Vaush commits the pre/trans fallacy, mistaking post-rationalist beliefs (hyper-green) for pre-rationalist beliefs (blue). It happens at 12:23, 13:08, 17:40, 23:20, 24:45, 29:50, 33:50, 34:50, 40:15, 42:47, 50:56 etc..

Essentially, Vaush has built up a wide array of cognitive schemas that link paranormal/irrational beliefs to conservatives, which is a result of years of ideological vitriol towards right-wingers. That could be an example of the lack of self-awareness and the self-deception mechanisms of Tier 1.

Edited by Carl-Richard

Intrinsic joy is revealed in the marriage of meaning and being.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

Edited by Megan Alecia

"We are like the spider. We weave our life and then move along in it. We are like the dreamer who dreams and then lives in the dream. This is true for the entire universe."

-- The Upanishads

Encyclopedia

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/23/2020 at 2:53 PM, Rilles said:

 

Love him! He should actually run for president. Seriously, why not? Not saying he would or should win, but he'd deliver an important message to a larger audience than just his YouTube followers. Love the rebranding of Socialism into Humanism. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From the Vagina Monologues by Eve Ensler. 


Dont look at me! Look inside!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't expect a gangsta-rap artist up in this thread didn't you? -_-

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Bernardo Carleial said:

 

I would actually place Michael Pollan as a Systems Thinker who it would be more appropriate to place as a Tier-2 Yellow thinker; granted I haven't read everything he's ever wrote, but from the books of his I have read it's obvious he has a deep understanding of Systems, and can approach subjects from multiple different perspectives without falling into a dogmatic and judgmental point of view. 

Edited by DocWatts

I'm writing a philosophy book! Check it out at : https://7provtruths.org/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vaush correctly diagnosing the problematic Narcissism of Purity Politics that's preventing Green zealots from engaging with the political process in order to enact the changes they would like to see.

 


I'm writing a philosophy book! Check it out at : https://7provtruths.org/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@DocWatts it could be. I've just been recently introduced to his works and I already enjoyed the points that he makes! He also wrote a book about psychedelics, called "How to change your mind." Really good!???

Edited by Bernardo Carleial

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Bernardo Carleial said:

@DocWatts it could be. I've just been recently introduced to his works and I already enjoyed the points that he makes! He also wrote a book about psychedelics, called "How to change your mind." Really good!???

Funny you mention that, I finished reading that a few weeks ago. Would be very interested to see him explore more topics outside of Food and Nutrition.


I'm writing a philosophy book! Check it out at : https://7provtruths.org/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Bernardo Carleial said:

Far-Left vs Far-Right(ideology)

The one voter having voted for the mixed option was right. It requires people who know how to write the constitution and those people are usually found already representing the people. However, there is obviously the possibility of corruption. Tricky game. I don't know how I would've voted.


Life Purpose journey

Presence. Goodness. Grace. Love.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Loving Radiance said:

The one voter having voted for the mixed option was right. It requires people who know how to write the constitution and those people are usually found already representing the people. However, there is obviously the possibility of corruption. Tricky game. I don't know how I would've voted.

A little more on what's going on in Chile

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now