The World Is Still Behind You

[Cortex]

If you don't see the world it doesn't exist right ? Well that's what Quentum mechanics says, and it would be great but it's not the case, because if enlightened master would meditate and believed that nothing exists if he doesn't perceive it, and I would shoot him in the head he would die anyway, or if he would meditate and believed that nothing exists but there was an asteroid hitting his head he would still die, everything exists that's how the world can function it can't be any other way  

[Sashaj]

so what do you think is really going on? 

[Consept]

But within your experience how can you see that? If you dont perceive the world then for you it doesnt exist, for example, if there was literally no one to perceive the world, how can it exist? Everything is transactional, so there has to be something that can perceive it for it to exist, so if something literally cant be perceived by anyone or anything does it exist?

[B_Naz]

Lol I see this all the time. The universe doesn't resolve around the enlightened monk. He can't stop a bullet, of course not, because the bullet itself is awareness.

[tsuki]

@Outer I am really enjoying your nonsense.

[tsuki]

24 minutes ago, Outer said:

Why is it nonsense?

@Outer I'm calling it nonsense to keep consistency with your nomenclature so that you can understand what I'm saying.

I'm recognizing the language of personal experience within these posts.
If you are looking into yourself on your own and actually explore what is happening, you will quickly notice that ordinary words are conflated with meaning that you do not intend to invoke.
The only thing to do then is to start using unorthodox linguistic means to encourage introspection.
Language that is supposed to invoke feeling similars to what you experience so that it can be inspected.
You call that gobbledygook/nonsense.

Nonsense is not an insult. It's a compliment.
All foreign languages are gobbledygook until you learn them.
How to learn a language that is just being invented?
Without a dictionary that would point to feelings?
It can still convey meaning if you know what you're doing.

I'm actually very surprised by your modest attempts at gobbledygook.
I think that @Faceless should see your posts as well. Well done!

Edited August 12, 2018 by tsuki

[tsuki]

5 minutes ago, Outer said:

So it's not nonsense or gobbledygook or jibberish.

@Outer Only if you insist that a single word has a single meaning.
That however undermines your ability to speak gobbledygook in a constructive way.
Have you ever read poetry? You could benefit from that.