Is god conscious of the entire universe?

[Malkom]

7 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

second, every minimal vibration that occurs never disappears; information never disappears, it is absorbed, transformed. Your breath creates a quantum flow that lasts eternally and affects, however minimally, all of reality, and therefore the moon. A quantum micro-fluctuation will inevitably occur on the moon, or whatever the moon may be at another time.

Information doesn't disappear, according to the law of conservation of information, which is analogous to the law of conservation of energy. Moreover, in quantum states, there is such a thing as "state memory" extending to uncountable infinity. But don't confuse cause and effect with the quantum world. It's better to delve deeper into the topic if you're interested. It's not something you can describe in a comment.

[Breakingthewall]

2 minutes ago, Malkom said:

Structural time? That's a three-dimensional word, bro. Everything you've written is a retelling of the "comics" of popular science show

Man, the way to talk for you is insulting? Look you are very knower but your lever of understanding is below my shoes. Little little clown 🤡. Little teacher. Read what I wrote 10 times every day for one month, maybe something enters in your hard understanding 

[Breakingthewall]

3 minutes ago, Malkom said:

Information doesn't disappear, according to the law of conservation of information, which is analogous to the law of conservation of energy. Moreover, in quantum states, there is such a thing as "state memory" extending to uncountable infinity. But don't confuse cause and effect with the quantum world. It's better to delve deeper into the topic if you're interested. It's not something you can describe in a comment.

Look little clown, if information never dissapear and your information never dissapear and the information of the moon never dissapear, in some moment some connection would happen. Erudite 🤡 

[Breakingthewall]

7 minutes ago, Malkom said:

Structural time? That's a three-dimensional word, bro. Everything you've written is a retelling of the "comics" of popular science shows. I have nothing against them; I think very highly of them, even incredibly highly. But we shouldn't forget that their main purpose is to convey at least something to the average person. That's not a deep understanding.

O my god. I have to read again to fix in my mind the definition of little quantum clown. Oh my quantum god.

[Malkom]

1 minute ago, Breakingthewall said:

Боже мой. Мне нужно перечитать, чтобы запомнить определение маленького квантового клоуна. Боже мой, квантовый.

If that's how you're going to communicate. I'll just delete you and that's it. You need to communicate with people like you quickly, harshly, and categorically. I hope you understand me. And you get it. You're not going anywhere. You've said it all. The rest will be the maximum of your diarrhea, you better go poop.

[Breakingthewall]

@Malkom look small, structural time doesn't mean 3 dimension, means that anything comes from a previous condition. "Previous" means that a condition produces a possibility. Then an observer would perceive a chain of events, and this is time. 

[Malkom]

1 minute ago, Breakingthewall said:

@Malkom look small, structural time doesn't mean 3 dimension, means that anything comes from a previous condition. "Previous" means that a condition produces a possibility. Then an observer would perceive a chain of events, and this is time.

The conversation is over. Don't write to me anymore. I don't like you.

[Breakingthewall]

1 minute ago, Malkom said:

If that's how you're going to communicate. I'll just delete you and that's it. You need to communicate with people like you quickly, harshly, and categorically. I hope you understand me. And you get it. You're not going anywhere. You've said it all. The rest will be the maximum of your diarrhea, you better go poop.

Sure little. Go to your university to scamm some ignorants with Your references to scientists and laws without saying anything clear because you know a lot but understand nothing. That's why you cite so many scientists here, to appear erudite, but you say nothing, you lack ideas, you're unclear, you're a closed-minded dumb. Shame so many data for no use

[Malkom]

2 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

Sure little. Go to your university to scamm some ignorants with Your references to scientists and laws without saying anything clear because you know a lot but understand nothing. That's why you cite so many scientists here, to appear erudite, but you say nothing, you lack ideas, you're unclear, you're a closed-minded dumb. Shame so many data for no use

But you're enlightened, go sit under the tree and get high, you useless piece of shit. Don't write to me anymore.

[Breakingthewall]

1 minute ago, Malkom said:

2 minutes ago, Malkom said:

But you're enlightened, go sit under the tree and get high, you useless piece of shit. Don't write to me anymore.

 

Ok I won't. Anyway, read what I wrote 10 times per day for just a couple of years, then maybe some understanding could happen. Don't get desperate first year, just be tenacious. 

[Malkom]

2 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

Ok I won't. Anyway, read what I wrote 10 times per day for just a couple of years, then maybe some understanding could happen. Don't get desperate first year, just be tenacious.

Shove your advice up your ass.

[Breakingthewall]

4 minutes ago, Malkom said:

4 minutes ago, Malkom said:

Shove your advice up your ass.

 

Ok, 3 years of reading then 😘

[cetus]

20 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

Man, the way to talk for you is insulting? Look you are very knower but your lever of understanding is below my shoes. Little little clown 🤡.

 

9 minutes ago, Malkom said:

But you're enlightened, go sit under the tree and get high, you useless piece of shit. Don't write to me anymore.

@Breakingthewall @Malkom  Hey, break it up. One more reply between either one of you and there will be warning points issued.

[NewKidOnTheBlock]

Spiritual beef lmfao first time I'm seeing something like that. Please don't delete the topic

[Breakingthewall]

16 minutes ago, cetus said:

 

@Breakingthewall @Malkom  Hey, break it up. One more reply between either one of you and there will be warning points issued.

Sure, but look, 

I've written six or seven detailed posts, striving for maximum clarity with no other intention than to initiate a connection, open up different viewpoints, compare ideas, and move towards greater clarity, and he replies that i read that in a comic. Well, I think my response was the bare minimum. I spent time and energy to write. Nobody here is interested in those topics then I thought: well, maybe that erudite wants to talk about it, but all his answer are: I'm better than you. And the last answer was: you are a retarded who read comics. So I can't avoid but get upset. It's normal I think 

Edited Tuesday at 02:30 PM by Breakingthewall

[Someone here]

You don't get to out-argue  Breakingthewall even if the topic is :the earth is actually flat .this is a fact of the forum . ❤️

[Breakingthewall]

1 minute ago, Someone here said:

You don't get to out-argue  Breakingthewall even if the topic is :the earth is actually flat .this is a fact of the forum . ❤️

I don't know, maybe if the argue is about the points that are given and not about who's more cool, then it could be possible 

[Malkom]

7 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

Sure, but look,

I've written six or seven detailed posts, striving for maximum clarity with no other intention than to initiate a connection, open up different viewpoints, compare ideas, and move towards greater clarity, and he replies that he read that in a comic. Well, I think my response was the bare minimum. I spent time and energy to write. Nobody here is interested in those topics then I thought: well, maybe that erudite wants to talk about it, but all his answer are: I'm better than you. And the last answer was: you are a retarded who read comics. So I can't avoid but get upset. It's normal I think

You're talking about things you don't even know about, if I'm competent at something, then that's it. And that you were so upset, you don't have an ego, you said that you are spiritually enlightened and know how everything works, you shouldn't have an ego, and my ego shouldn't hurt your EGO. It doesn't matter to me, I don't play enlightened hypocritical games. What about you, dude? I don't care, though. Live with it. You don't have to answer, you've already said it all.

[Someone here]

@Breakingthewall you two are highly intelligent but you get lost in proving who has bigger intellectual dick. Just let it go .

[Breakingthewall]

@Someone here do you see? You don't know nothing, I'm better, you are worse,.etc. But any reference to any point? Anyway, maybe anyone would like to read those posts 

Edited Tuesday at 02:37 PM by Breakingthewall