Florian

Member
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    387

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Florian

  4. Posted

    4 minutes ago, Princess Arabia said:

    Another woman hater confirmed 

    so I am a women hater because I say that women can be abusive? 

    I think you are just an abusive and ignorant women. If you were a man you would propably be a rapist. Your playing the victim and trying to gaslight others is the equivilant of men intimidating with the threat of violence or actually using unjustified violence for their survival.

    It baffles me that you are able to freely post your bullshit in this forum.

    @StarStruck idk what you posted before that she reffered to as sexist but in this scenario I wanna make sure you know you are right.

  5. Posted

    On 17.9.2023 at 11:50 AM, StarStruck said:

    Now we know where your Tate shadow comes from

     

    On 17.9.2023 at 11:54 AM, Leo Gura said:

    If I was a sex trafficker I should have sympathy for Tate's sex trafficking. But I don't.

    but if that sex trafficker part was your shadow, as he said, you would not have sympathy for him, but be repelled by him. actually fascinating to see how you can be so ignorant. are you doing this on purpose to show people that even their greatest idols can be wrong? cause that is basic shadow work, isnt it?

  7. Posted

    On 17.9.2023 at 5:02 AM, Princess Arabia said:

    This comment here should be REMOVED. Very sexist and inappropriate. It actually made me cringe.

     

    On 17.9.2023 at 5:05 AM, Princess Arabia said:

    What is wrong with you.

    Holy shit the gaslighting. Trying to silence this guy cause he shines light on womens abusive behavior. You are soooo sus. Like a female version of a rapist that is ignorant of the fact that he is a rapist.

  12. Posted · Edited by Florian
    added note

    Some years ago I asked myself the question "is astrology real?". Then I read some stuff about the star signs and started thinking about it. I compared the stuff I read about the sign related to myself and checked if it matches up. Then I read some more and learned about elements and sexes of the signs. At some point I came to the conclusion that there is truth to it and also that the concept of astrology is actually a very very sophisticated system with infinite complexity which is why many people call is bullshit, as they just dont understand it (which in itself doesnt prove that it is true though). I see it that it could be kinda like the "spiritual DNA" of humans. I believe in biology there is different genes that server different purposes and the star signs are compareble to those. In biology you wont solely identify someone by one certain gene but I perceive it that the general opinion on astrology is that it tries doing exactly that, which makes no sense, hence it is bullshit.

    I believe to be good at analysing general dynamics in system, which is what I did with astrology as decribed above. I didn't dive into the nitty gritty details of it though, I just came to the conclusion it is a system with a logical structure. There also seems to be a context as to WHY it exists (I believe it is the system behind reincarnations of "souls" and the different purposes of these reincarnations). I don't know exactly HOW it works except maybe "cosmic energies", which kinda sounds wohoo to me but also I think it makes sense that the different states of planets have an effect on each other (including the earth) and thus also what is inclusive to the earth like humans. If there are any people here that have more indepths knowledge on astrology I welcome you to post beneath this or dm me, as I am still a bit interested.

    And as an end note: the reason I made this thread is because I just read a post by Leo in which he classified astrology as bullshit as an example of new age stuff that Peter Walston wants to differentiate himself from, which made triggered these memories in me. And because of that I am also interested in @Leo Guras more detailed opinion on astrology.

     

    Note: I used the term "spiritual" DNA because thats the first thing that came to mind and in this moment I defnined spirituality with what seems to be there but is not understood. However I think maybe "cosmic" or "soul" DNA would be a better word, as people have different definitions on the word spirituality. For example I believe Leo once said Spirituality is just what is or something like that.

  13. Posted

    @Someone here 

    17 hours ago, Someone here said:

    But still  ..Every religion..and every society in all times have demonstrated hatred of women 

    You are saying in every religion and society in all times hatred of women is like a core value? I think thats absolutely bs. It is just a thing of survival. In these times societys were only able to survive if men were leading cause it was a much harsher world then today and men are more suitable to lead in these circumstances. The more peaceful and safe a society becomes, the more power women get. Cause these are the circumstances where they bloom. If you look at the most developed societes of today you see they are transforming into matriachies. As soon as all old people from previous generations, who currently are still holding power, die, you will see women "offically" being the ones in power. And I think they already have more power then men in general. But maybe it wont get that far cause the world still isnt all peaceful and safe outside of these countries and they might be swallowed up as soon as they get too weak to survive.

  15. Posted

    14 hours ago, Buck Edwards said:

    What I meant is Grande work is pure gold standard. JP is a delusional fool who thinks too much of himself, he is good at milking opportunities. I mainly see him as an opportunist. He used to have a few good lectures like 5 years ago. He is good with the academic part. He is callous when it comes to psychology and does a lot of pseudo-intellectualism. And with politics, he is just full of shit, he has so many biases, granted he can be quite articulate with his opinion and I don't entirely deny certain conservative positions, he is not as lunatic as other extreme conservatives, yet his content is still depressing and is usually nihilistic and superficial. 

     

    tbf I have not seen much of JPs content recently expect for some videos that pop up here and there so I might not really be up to date but can you give me some examples of what makes you say he is a pseudo-intellectualist and full of shit with politics. I definitly see the point that he is somewhat callous though. In the video that started this threat alone, when I saw the introduction that starts at like 0:40 I also thought to myself that his interaction with his daughter seemed quite heartless. I mean it is known she had tons of health problems with autoimmune disorders her whole life until she discovered this carnivore diet. Watching this actually makes me feel like these disorders might have come from an lack of love as a child as I heard a lot and also experienced myself how emotional states effect your body/health. Still though judging him only based off that is foolish. He might not be a well rounded guy but he is a good conservative. So unless you show me some examples of him tweeting some insane shit or him giving some shit politic takes then I still believe you are just too biased to see and appreciate his value. And of course his content is rather depressing as we are coming from a rather depressing world of the past, compared to the world of today, but we survived that world and made it a better place. His job as a conservative is to keep the memory of the past so we don't forget and fall back there. You know the world isnt just happy and sunshine? And only a weak person wants a world of only happy and sunshine as well.

  16. Posted

    1 hour ago, Buck Edwards said:

    Then you haven't explored him. 

    Jordan Peterson or Grande? I watched like 2min of a Grande video and nothing seemed to indicate that he is a shit, but of course just 2min.

    I assume you mean Peterson though. For him I have seem a lot more over the years and I think he is a pretty intelligent and thought-through man, in his field that is. He is a very passionate conservative so I understand you might have a negative bias towards his values and ways of thinking if you are rather liberal but that is just your ignorance. 

  19. Posted

    @Insightful27 I think ye the analogy is true but in real life skill points are obvoiously a lot more nuanced then in a video game. Here skill points are basically the product of time and energy and the skill tree that you can put them into is infinitly times bigger and more nuanced then any video game. So yea of course you are limited, unless you find a way to "hack" life or find a "glitch" if there are any (and even then you would propably still be limited in some way). Inside this game you are limited by the rules that god made for the game. You start it with a certain unique build and set of stats and you got time and energy at your hands which you can use to improve those. Of course again these aspects are infinitly more nuanced then any video game you could play.

  20. Posted

    @An young being

    9 hours ago, An young being said:

    1. Both psychedelics and years of meditation work by reducing activity in the brain and can produce the oneness experience. We are not producing any new experience here, instead we are just shutting down the veil created by the brain. Both psychedelics and years of meditation does this job perfectly.

    I think thats wrong. As far as I know at least LSD makes your brain more active and connects parts of your brain that usually don't work together.

  22. Posted

    40 minutes ago, r0ckyreed said:

    Dolphins are more intelligent in terms of not polluting the earth and being friendly towards each other. Whereas humans have struggles with just co-existing amongst each other. It really depends on how you define intelligence because it is so nuanced.

    I think thats not true. Dolphins do some horrible shit sometimes. They just don't have the capabilities of destruction that humans have.

  23. Posted

    5 hours ago, Consept said:

    If it was integrity, he would stand behind what he's saying now instead of denying it or claiming it was 10 years ago or that it was only helping girls with silly tiktok videos. He said the things he said before because he probably didn't think he was doing anything illegal or if he was he wasn't famous enough for anyone to care. 

    Aside from that he lies all the time, everything from being a chess champion, which was checked and didn't happen, to how much money he has, he claimed a billion when the feds only found 10 mill in cash and assets (although he could be hiding money). 

    He is charismatic and can be funny but that's about it, integrity isn't his strong point

    He isn't teaching high values but survival so in that sense I think there is a certain integrety to him.

  24. Posted

    10 hours ago, something_else said:

    I don’t think he is the saviour you want him to be.

    I don't want him to be a saviour. I don't consume his content except for videos that were force fed to me on YouTube. I don't know if I gained any actual value from that but I was wondering why the fuck he got so famous and what I described above is what my conclusion was. Personally I don't really care about him except finding him annoying but at the same time having some type of respect for him. 

     

    10 hours ago, something_else said:

    There are better masculine roles models out there than Tate.

    Then why are they not as famous as Tate? Because they are propably advanced for the grand masses.

  25. Posted

    12 hours ago, zurew said:

    Hahahaha, im crying from laughter. Thats why he bragged about it proudly ,right?

    Also he has so much integrity that after he self snitched multiple times ,now he tries to deny everything and just says that all of that was just a character. - thats a peak of integrity for ya

    Obviously not peak of integrety but a form of integrety yes