Seed

Member
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    626

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Seed

  5. Posted · Edited by Seed

    1 hour ago, Alex M said:

    How is the BBCs treatment excessive? Just from reporting on the story? Or something else?

    I think the public lynching pre trial or conviction is unfair.

     

    Also the fact he was pushing boundaries alongside the entire noughties culture at this point. It was the ‘norm’ and very much an  era where this behavior  was encouraged and enabled… by both men and women. 

     

    He’s been well and truly scapegoated. I’m not saying he’s innocent but the way he’s being treated PRE conviction is despicable. 
     

    He’s given a lot and touched many lives and ultimately believe he’s a good human but took a while to find his way. However he must pay the fair punishment for his crimes IF they were committed

  7. Posted · Edited by Seed

    20 minutes ago, Danioover9000 said:

    @LSD-Rumi

       It's disgusting to think he'd, if he did, rape those women while he was married with kids. Hope he gets merked! All mention of Russell Brand here should be ignored. We should cancel and censor mention of him here.

    No the alleged assaults happened during his sex crazed, drug fueled era before he reformed himself. 

    He writes in his book that he had years of therapy and self development before he would even allow himself to consider becoming a father. 

  9. Posted

    1 minute ago, LSD-Rumi said:

    Oh he is married and have kids, it will be really hard for them :(

    Yes, Laura Brand, his wife is so lovely and down to earth as well. He claims that she ‘tamed’ him…. (Not soon enough unfortunately) And she hates fame, excess and limelight… that’s why he stopped appearing on mainstream tv, because he met her and she couldn’t stand it  

    she appears very ‘normal’ and has Insta page which is now deleted promoting creative and natural play activities for children.

     

  10. Posted

    He’s got some cheek really hasn’t he.

    His last vid I reckon lost any Shred of  empathy I pay have had for the public hanging. 
     

    He’d have done better if he’d had shown some vulnerability and authenticity. Instead he’s hiding away behind the conspiracy shield. 
     

    he really didn’t seem like any version of himself I’d ever seen.

    this is def a case of ‘don’t bite the hand tht feed you… ‘ but also, I’m pretty sure he’s guilty which is tragic

    I wonder what side his heavily pregnant wife is on…. What must be going through her right now, poor woman. And they have two other young kids.

    they are the innocent ones that sadly having their lives destroyed for his decade old errors / crimes as well ? 
     

     

  11. Posted · Edited by Seed

    20 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

    It's cute how he cloaks himself in the anti-corpo narrative.

    Yes, corporations are scummy. But that does not in any way account for Russell Brand's sexual scumminess.

    See, in this case the BBC actually cares more about women than Russell Brand did when he worked for them.

    There is nothing unique about mainstream corps pushing narratives. Russell Brand and his ilk also push narratives, and often more dangerous and untruthful ones.

    off he goes for a rumble in the jungle….

    Clearly just carrying on as usual then with his show  as if none of this is happening.

     

     

  18. Posted

    Just a thought. But the woman who claims she was raped against the wall said that a friend was round at the time, that he was suggesting they all had sex together which was when she said ‘no, I’m not doing that…’ and then he proceeded to rape her.

    surely this other person would have been a witness ? Unless he was lying that someone was round?

     

    just popped into my mind at random… perhaps there was no one there. 

     

     

  19. Posted

    @Leo Gura I personally think that they agreed to have sex, she realised he wasnt wearing a condom middway, asked him to stop but he continued until ejaculation, which obviously still counts as rape and explains the condom bit. 

    Him saying 'that was crazy and selfish' and her saying 'do I need to get checked' sounds like a dispute over the lack of condom, but I also agree force and therfore rape was involved. 

  21. Posted · Edited by Seed

    6 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

    @Jodistrict How do you explain Russell's own texts apologizing to the allegedly raped girl the next day?

    I percieved it has him apologising for not wearing a condom (either due to him lying and saying he had put one on and for her to find out afterwards that he hadnt and storming off, or him taking it off halfway through)

    However, both of these are still classified as rape.

     

    It appears that celebrities are 'guilty until proven innocent' 

  22. Posted · Edited by Seed

    13 minutes ago, Butters said:

    I don't wanna go off topic but can someone please explain why women can have sex and then retroactively say it wasn't consensual? That's not how anything in life works, why would rape work that way? 

    because they may consent and then the guy takes off the condom halfway through, forces them into a position they are uncomfortable with or finds that they feel sick and want to stop. So they are allowed to say ‘no more I want to stop cause of X Y Z, and then if the person continues then it’s rape 

  23. Posted · Edited by Seed

    2 hours ago, Buck Edwards said:

    I don't want to support a rapist if he is really a rapist. That won't be fair if the allegations are true. Being neutral is the best position. 

    I think one solid way to put an end to this nonsense of true versus false rape allegations is to have text message regarding consent before having sex. An agreement sort of. This way both parties are saved unnecessary stress. The women who make false claims will not get away with it since there will be evidence to the contrary in the form of a consent text. And a rapist won't get away with raping women because he will face the burden to produce proof that he had acquired explicit consent before sex and ensured it carefully. This way he has evidence(or lack of it) to prove that he wasn't simply engaging in sex without any self awareness but it was legit consensual sex and if he cannot produce that, in some ways he could be liable for being irresponsible around consent. The burden of proof is on both sides and should ideally be on both sides.

    After reviewing some of the evidence (now of course nobody knows how things went down), it seems like he did rape the woman or at least forced himself upon her(which is obviously rape), if her words are to be believed. He got inside her forcefully despite her not wanting it. That's rape. I'm surprised she didn't press charges on him right away with the police at the time. It could be his influence or the shame she must have felt. 

    And what if after sending the 'consent'' text, the man starts fucking the girl too hard, forces her into a postion she is not comfortable with or just just doesnt stop when / if she has had enough. IS there a consent form for the positions allowed, the duration of the sex, the type? 

    You see - there is no 'easy' solution, Having sex with someone you dont know well or trust is risky for both parties. So just dont take any risks unless you trust them enough to not claim rape if you have not raped them.#

    To avoid being accused of rape, at any point, before or during the encounter - if the woman says 'no'. You stop. You get off. And you do NOT try and change her mind.

    It really is as 'simple' as that to not rape someone. 

    The issues you are talking about are false accusations which will be highly minimised if you take consideration and thought into who you place your penis inside. The same applies  if you dont want to get yourself or anyone else hurt - then you dont drink or drive... same applies to dont drink and fuck. Especially strangers. That is like driving some random car from a scrap heap and getting angry when and sad when it blows up on your face. ? 

    Sex is risky as is driving. Take precautions… it’s really not rocket science. 
     

    1. Trust the person

    2. Be sober enough to drive a car if you are going to shag, particularly in the early days

    3. Be aware of how she’s feeling if she indicates she’s not interested or not enjoying it. You stop. This could be in the form of pushing you off, saying no, freezing up, crying. Use your brain and if it’s too complicated then just don’t have sexual encounters with  anyone.