Ry4n

Member
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    939

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Ry4n

  1. Posted

    1 hour ago, Tyler Robinson said:

    I'm not promoting anything other than reality. You're trying to sugarcoat reality by using masks of toxic Masculinity and femininity. You don't understand that survival is brutal. You can create utopia in your mind but life is always unfair. The world is unfair. Everything is unfair. Instead of sugarcoating to satisfy your mind, adapt to circumstances. 

    No relationship survives where the woman does better than the man. Learn to gain practice experience instead of spouting off theories. 

    In reality women are programmed to rely on men for survival. It's nature. If it's toxic, yea it doesn't align with the principles of humanity. But so does anything else including rape, abuse, crime, murder, divorce, death, disease, disability and everything else. 

    There's so much economic disparity in the world. Is that fair? People eat meat. Is that fair? 

    Why should dating be fair? Every aspect of life is determined by human nature. Is human nature fair? 

    You're trying to change something that is unchangeable. It's almost like saying lions should stop eating flesh and start eating leaves and grass. But a lion is not programmed for that. However you can argue that a lion is promoting toxic Masculinity by attacking a deer. But that's what lions are supposed to do. That's how they survive. It's indeed unfair and biased and hurtful to the deer, against ethics and morality. 

    But does a lion give a fuck about your morality.i don't think so. 

    Humans might be better than animals but we aren't completely free of our animal nature. Remember we have a reptilian brain. We cannot control hunger, thirst, sleep, these cannot go away with modernity. A child sucking his thumb is not going to go away with modernity. Your taste buds won't change because of modernity. Your lungs still need oxygen. They are not going to switch to carbon dioxide because of modernity. What I mean is that certain animal aspects of our human psyche remain static and won't change despite leaps in technology. 

    Survival aspects are deeply coded in our DNA. They are a part of our reptilian brain. These aspects aren't pleasant, moral or ethical. But they are what they are and shouldn't be sugar coated. If you don't reality the easier way you will only learn it the harder way 

    Millions of women depend on men. It's their reality. Just like millions of people are poor. You can't change these things nor can you blame these things. 

    A woman needs a man for her survival and security. She is attracted to men who can provide her better. 

    If you told me to pick a man out of a row of 20 men, I will most likely pick a guy who looks more masculine, taller and stronger, better looking with a stronger jaw and a better BMI. I won't feel attracted to shorter weaker timid looking men. Even if those men were nice to me. It won't matter because they simply cannot generate attraction in me. But why should I be shamed for something I feel naturally. That's just my biology. You can't shame someone's biology as long as it's not criminal. 

    We want basic ethics in society to ensure that innocent people don't die. But we cannot remove all layers of our biological programming because it's simply impossible. You'll have to wipe out everyone. It's like saying get rid of people who masturbate to porn. Think how many people you would need to eliminate. 

    Our humanity is combined of both human and territorial aspects. These territorial aspects are the reptilian parts. That's why women are attracted to bad boys. You can reprogram this slightly. Make her want a bad boy who is slightly better than a caveman. But you can't change her completely and make her want a passive timid guy. 

    There's nothing  healthy in this world. People are addicted to coke and junk food everyday. Only certain aspects are healthy but everything cannot be perfect. You can tell a child to stop playing video games. But you cannot tell him to stop eating candy. 

    What I'm saying is you're trying to achieve the perfect recipe for humanity minus all toxicity. But that's ridiculous and very idealistic. Nothing will ever be perfect. Most people are average on the scale of consciousness. Nobody is too animalistic nor is anyone a perfect Saint. It's best if you drop idealism and embrace reality and stop  sugarcoat brutal realities. 

     

    TLDR;
    Life hard so imma be shitty 

    A80568D8-FD36-451C-82B3-E737AFCEC035.jpeg

  2. Posted

    8 hours ago, Heart of Space said:

    That's extremely naive.  You're not a being completely devoid of attributes.  

    You have unique qualities that people place on a hierarchy.  Among those are looks and wealth for men.

    The quicker you get over this idea, the quicker you will have an accurate judge of the reality you live in.  

    Your view exists among men who lack those attributes.  It's a way for you to be more competitive on the dating market.  No offense.

    I’m communicating that it’s more than looks and money that make a long term relationship which is true. Obviously looks and money attract, money matters in a logistic sense, but outside of that that doesn’t make a long term relationship and there’s way more that goes into than that. It’s really you who’s trying to simplify this issue as if it’s nothing but hierarchies that is itself naïve; those hierarchies only matter to such a degree with regards to attraction, not long term romantic relationships. 
    In modern society it is both genders that need to be the “bread winner”. 
    Nice collection of assumptions for a literal stranger on the internet btw. 

  4. Posted

    3 minutes ago, Tyler Robinson said:

    don't know why the onus of compromising sexual preferences is always placed on women meanwhile men are allowed to go scot free on this one. 

    No we aren't; we're shamed for our preferences all the time. 

    You're sexual preferences are not threatening to anyone but yourself it doesn't affect me. 

    Men and women will both suffer the consequences of sleeping around too much. 

    Both parties need to be accommodated for. 

    Men are expected to compromise all the time. At the end of the day both should be working as a team. 

    Looks and money are both attraction strategies that have nothing to do with real romantic love; overly valuing either is shallow on both ends. 

    Here's the study I referred to:

    https://www.ibtimes.com/are-women-more-emotional-men-not-really-study-finds-3324258

    It's just very obvious that you've had some terrible relationship experiences that have made you biased around this issue; I just hope you aren't doing something to continuously attract such types because that's usually the case if this becomes a recurring pattern. 

    We're all hurt in some ways, but it's never an excuse to take it out on anyone, including a naive man. Even just believing that men are like this creates a self-fulfilling prophecy and it is ugly. Beneath every abusive man you've ever known is a weak, vulnerable little child, and I can say that because I've been around abusive people I know how traumatising it can get. Continuing to demonise and dehumanise such people only prevents one from healing and letting go; it never justifies what they did but it does allow you to let it go. Don't stoop to the level of shallow people; there's plenty of guys myself included that care way more about personality and character than looks. Find those guys and you won't even have the thought of money enter your head. I guarantee it. 

  5. Posted

    24 minutes ago, Tyler Robinson said:

    I don't like the idea that my future husband will be making less than me. It makes me feel insecure.

    Yeah and that's an issue.

    Plenty of non-abusive, non-insecure men who make less than their female counterparts; it's only an assumption that all lesser earning men would be this way. It may come from lived experience but it is still a generalisation. 

    "I think women are called the gentler sex for a reason." There's studies that prove that men are actually the more emotional gender, so that statement is toxic masculinity. 

    Maybe the insecurity those men feel about making less money comes from the toxically masculine idea that they need to earn more which you're promoting. You say you don't want a man who makes less, and the previous men in your life who did make less felt insecure about it. Coincidence? No it isn't. I'm certain they had their own issues on top of that and were extremely fucked up mentally no doubt, but the toxically masculine idea you're promoting contributes to that very problem. 

    "In the end, most relationships are going to be toxic anyway." Wrong. That also sounds like an excuse to use a man for his money.

  7. Posted

    2 minutes ago, Tyler Robinson said:

    At least I won't end up with a cuck 

    hahahaha. Trust me you won't have anyone watching cos they'll be nothing to watch! Unless you're willing to date a lower earning man of course; he could very well be the man of your dreams in literally every other aspect of human life, but you say no because of lower income? 

    Well! Good luck to you then! Certainly won't be easy.

    "I'm just promoting survival agenda and nothing else." No it's a sexual reference; you don't need a man to survive, and if you think you do then you're definitely the very furthest thing from a feminist. 

  8. Posted

    6 minutes ago, Tyler Robinson said:

    Also expecting women to simply drop their survival agenda when they have been programmed for it seems like toxic femininity to me. 

    Women can survive on their own now so that statement is simply irrelevant; you're not dropping your survival agenda at all you're just admitting that this particular sexual preference is something you'll have to work around; we all have to adjust our desires because no one is going to tick all the boxes. 

    It's actually this mindset being perpetuated that is toxically feminine because it presumes women still need a man to survive when this is simply not the case; you're promoting toxic masculinity AND toxic femininity right now with such unrealistic expectations. 

  9. Posted

    3 minutes ago, Tyler Robinson said:

    Then also get used to women not feeling attracted to your type. 

    Also expecting women to simply drop their survival agenda when they have been programmed for it seems like toxic femininity to me. 

    Oh I'm fine with that, it's that they will end up alone because statistically this is the direction we are going in; women are making more, men are making less and it's only going in that direction more. Nothing wrong with it, I don't care at all I'm not complaining, I know I can still score a quality person, it's just that this massive delusional demographic will end up alone. This is only your loss unless you're willing to date a man who makes less than you. 

    Also you completely assumed what my type is or who I even am based off what I said so nice one. 

  10. Posted

    On 9/11/2022 at 8:24 PM, Mesopotamian said:

    Start thinking of women as people

    Wow see I thought women were like plants or robots with no sentience that just exist for my sexual gratification as an insecure beta boy but now that you've told me they're actually real people with real emotions my entire reality has truly changed forever. 

    Sorry couldn't help myself. But yeah seriously dude go outside and talk to women more because no who does that speaks like this. Just remember that the internet isn't actually indicative at all of the real world.

  11. Posted

    On 9/11/2022 at 8:19 AM, Tyler Robinson said:

    Similarly, a woman just doesn't feel it for a man who can't provide or protect. 

    Providing can also mean being a stay at home Dad...

    As far as protecting we could only do so much even if we were twice your size; it's called a gun lol.

    We definitely don't need to be your knight in shining armour love, get used to it.

    We definitely don't need to make more money than you either, so get used to that as well. 

    These would be the 2 reasonable changes in mindset modern women should adopt to adapt to the times just like how men have to adjust to modernity in their own ways. 

    Not to say there aren't plenty of women who know this already and are totally fine with it, but there's also a certain demographic that want these traditional ideals without being traditional themselves which is hypocritical. If you want a good modern man as a modern women accept they may make less money than you and that does not make them any less of a man because of it, if you believe that to be the case then you are contributing to genuine toxic masculinity.

     

  14. Posted

    17 hours ago, OBEler said:

    I do it right now every second day low dose and I feel grounded, no problem 

    There are no rules for taking this so go for your intuition

    Random somewhat unrelated question here.....

    If regular dmt with all its entities and beings freaks me out too much to reach the breakthrough, would I not be mentally strong enough for 5meo? Non-dual experiences are extremely blissful for me every time because of the sense of resolution, but I hear many say you shouldn't do 5meo if you cannot handle regular dmt.

  15. Posted

    On 25/10/2022 at 4:49 AM, LordFall said:
    On 25/10/2022 at 4:36 AM, NoSelfSelf said:

    @LordFall You are not commiting to either side thats why it doesnt work you are dipping your toes in 2 different pools..

    You valuing yourself is only way anyone is going to value you but it comes from not wanting anyone to value you because in that way you will be 100% focused on yourself and your inner things that will bring true value or you will try to trick and manipulate good luck with that existence...

    This and your other comment are exactly what I mean by pseudo-spiritual nonsense. That's a good mindset but it literally doesn't work. You are literally a human being in a society made up of human beings. Being consumed by others' perception of you is of course a fool's errand but not taking it into account is just as much. Be careful not to drink too much of the kool-aid. 

    Nah he is speaking facts especially because women pick up on "vibes" and one's "energy" more so than men do; the fact that seemingly frustrates you proves my point exactly that men don't get this subtle energy and mentally that one carries oneself through life or at least don't see it as much in others compared to women; this masculine mentality is incredibly attractive to women, but doesn't keep a woman if the man's actions don't back it. 

    It's the mentality that leads to success, women can see that. 

  16. Posted

    On 26/10/2022 at 2:41 PM, Clabber Girl said:

    What else would a woman's value be linked to? Say its 80% sexuality/reproduction value... what is that 20% if she develops herself to the max ?

    Nurturing qualities are a woman's most powerful qualities (at least most of the time) which is precisely what is being undermined by feminism. 

    A nurturing leader is necessary in today's world, but unfortunately women are just being taught to behave like men whilst the same traits in men are simultaneously vilified. Strange world in the west. 

    Great example would be the cringeworthy "boss bitch" mentality which is extremely disgusting to men; that's not a high value trait at all.

  17. Posted

    On 25/10/2022 at 2:51 AM, StarStruck said:

    You can even see it on the forum. If a female opens a topic, tons of horny dudes (who suppose to be spiritual) jump on the topic to help the damsel in distress, but if a brother opens the same topic, he will get substantially less attention and care.

    YEP welcome to the real world brother haha. Don't worry men are getting more encouraging of each other as the problem gets more noticed. 

  18. Posted

    On 30/10/2022 at 6:14 PM, KH2 said:

    Yup, extremely threatening. Every morning I travel around the world in a plane, finding the nearest anti-gay marches, and chanting "Down with the gays! Down with the gays!" Then I come back home in the evenings, to meet up with my secret gay lover.

    LOL!

    I on my computer, know exactly what a literal stranger on the internet using a limited communication form is thinking and feeling and his/her most innermost desires and insecurities. Psychic! 

  21. Posted

    On 9/10/2022 at 6:23 PM, OBEler said:

    @Ry4n interesting, how did you do that exactly (doses and Timing)? 

     

    Keta is really interesting substance and good Researched. Still no one knows really about why "brain damage" can happen over time 

    A solid method for me was 1.5 grams and doing small K bumps almost immediately after whilst waiting for the mushroom effects to kick in. The mushrooms were potent though so you may need more but when combined not much of either substance is needed at all. 
     

    It seems to replicate exactly what I’d imagine the meditative journey to enlightenment through Buddhism would be; essentially stripping away all the layers of identity until all you’re left with is the “I am”; that void of pure awareness, however subsequently when the psilocybin kicks in the full divine nature of that awareness is revealed alongside the classic Unity experience. 

    It’s absolutely fascinating transitioning from a peaceful, detached state of pure awareness into a divine, infinite, connected unity experience immediately after. 

     

  25. Posted

    On 6/10/2022 at 4:20 PM, Tyler Robinson said:

    Is slut shaming a projection of male insecurity is there some truth to this moral shaming of women?

    Only seen and heard about Women slut shaming other women personally but Male insecurity could sometimes be the reason.

    It's tricky because male attractiveness to a woman does decrease if she's slept around a lot, but I mean A LOT. Not only that but (scientific fact) pair bonding hormones that release during sex will not be released as much after enough "hoe-ing around" which dramatically decreases chances of success with regards to Long term relationships, so doing it enough will certainly have consequences at least for the people who want long term relationships.

    Bottom line being a "slut" is bad for everyone, and whilst nobody should be getting bullied for it, I'm honestly not quite sure that what Gen Z need right now is less shame lol, 5 minutes on Tik Tok makes me think they need more of it. We've lost a lot of basic behavioural standards these days.