JuliusCaesar

Member
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    859

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by JuliusCaesar

  1. Posted

    1 hour ago, RyanK said:

    @Edvardas @JuliusCaesar @Thought Art Sometimes I try to transcend language.. it’s language that I use to speak to myself and to describe reality to myself ..and it helps to try and forget it. If I didn’t know any words or language at all, then The Truth would just be what is..so simple. I complicate everything with language. Make sense? You guys feel the same?

     

    Truth is prior to human language because existence itself is prior to specific things existing.

  3. Posted · Edited by JuliusCaesar

    @Tech36363  I once tried to do the conventional method. So, I went out in the early morning about 40 minutes or so after sunrise and stared for 10 seconds. And while I did feel a burst of energy, and indeed didn't feel hungry for hours longer than normal, I was seeing spots for about 2 and a half hours after the fact. And so, I concluded that people doing this practice are imbecilic morons.

     

    However, I did some thinking about the fact that it did seem to kill my need for food and frankly made me feel amazing physically and mentally even though I only did it for such a short duration. As such I decided to try it with my eyes closed. See, if you stare into it with eyes closed, your lids block most of the ultraviolet light which is what destroys your eyes. 

     

    Doing this eye closed practice, I've been able to stare into the Sun for in excess of 40 minutes even when it's highest in the sky without causing any measurable damage. And while it's not as powerful as eyes opened, it still has some impact. However, I've mostly abandoned the practice as of late. Though I did manage to cure some Squamous Cell Carcinoma I had been developing on my phalanges by doing this. So, it certainly seems to be beneficial to physical health at least in some capacity.

     

  4. Posted

    5 hours ago, Breakingthewall said:

    because existence is wild, and pain is depth, and without it there is no balance. it is necessary for the perfection of the painting. oceans of suffering and oceans of joy mixed in a whirlwind for the greater glory of actual existence. a love song where no tone or note can be left out. the beauty of one color is not superior to the beauty of another color. Would you like a painting in pastel tones? it is a shit! we talk about total art, supreme, absolute. 

    I have one word for you. Ibuprofen. It works wonders.

     

    On a side note, you know what the difference between a soldier and a medic is? Soldiers believe that water cures everything, whereas medics believe that Ibuprofen cures everything.

  5. Posted

    On 11/19/2022 at 8:26 AM, RyanK said:

    @JuliusCaesar thanks for taking the time to explain all of this. Helps a lot ❤️?

    You're welcome.

     

    On 11/19/2022 at 8:40 AM, RyanK said:

    @JuliusCaesar side question - when I look in the mirror, is that just a form that appears, to trick myself that it’s ‘me’ ? Just like everything else that appears? (A tree, a dog, other people, etc)

    In the sense that it's just an electromagnetic radiational message bearing your image, it could be called an illusion. As it appears to be an exact duplicate of your physical body but is not so solid. 

     

    In a more absolute sense, there is no such thing as illusion. Even what humans call optical illusions, because the truth is whatever reality is. And all you have of reality is your experience of it, therefore any experience you have is truth/real/absolute.

     

     

  6. Posted

    2 minutes ago, Moksha said:

    I agree that religious people can awaken at a certain level. They may not be fully awake yet because they are stuck in the worshiper-God duality, but spirituality is still possible. At one point in my life, I was quite religious and had spiritual experiences that were realizations of Consciousness, which I called God. Letting go of my beliefs was a step toward awakening, but it still took many years of suffering before I was dissolved enough to see.

    It's funny you write this, as I just came from Church, we did the Christ the King mass. And I'm of course probably the only person in there that's God realized, but that doesn't stop me from practicing Catholicism and pretending not to know what I know so as not to offend the laity.

  7. Posted

    5 hours ago, at_anchor said:

    It is unrelated to modern day European languages and very difficult to learn for people who grew up in Europe, America, Africa, and elsewhere, but I want to ask, how hard is it to learn Chinese? The language is a cold thing. There is nothing passionate about it. So the goal with learning a language is to speak to others, live in another place, find a job there, or just to improve your English as the case is when learning Latin. But really, how hard can it be to learn Chinese? I don't want to live in the west anymore. Hoping to get away from all my problems by moving to China or Thailand or something over there. Can learning Chinese be done? Honestly I think all your wisdom and ideas which is like seeds, gets thrown on rocks or on the side of the road or in thorny areas when told to me. But keep responding because someone else might benefit.

    Edit: I actually don't mind living in the west, but the poverty and life circumstances are pushing me to suicide or to go far away.

    Get yourself a monthly subscription with Pimsleur and do their Chinese.

  9. Posted · Edited by JuliusCaesar

    36 minutes ago, vladorion said:

    If the criminal code of the United States (or wherever you live) didn't classify rape as an offence, would it be okay?

    It does as you know. But anyhow, it's clear that you seem to have a strong desire to know how I feel about the matter. My human entity does not feel that rape is inherently evil. But that it can be in that it can inflict harm upon innocent people. So strictly speaking, as a generality I would say that it would not be ideal. If I felt strongly about such a hypothetical situation, were I in that very reality, then I'd likely do something to change it.

     

    36 minutes ago, vladorion said:

    I didn't think we were talking about legal systems and whether he broke any laws of his time.

    I render verdicts in honour, with justice, and equity for all. You wanted to know what my position is, and now you have it.

     

    To help alleviate your misapprehension with my way of thinking. Know that when a Judge has been sitting on the bench for a considerable period of time, the attitudes and procedures of a Judge wind up bleeding into other areas of their life. So, you should understand that I may utilize legal thinking in everyday life as a sort of professional hazard.

     

     

  10. Posted

    24 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

    I'm not sure if there are non toxic thoughts in terms of realizing the self. there may be thoughts that help deconstruct. new thoughts that help soften monolithic thoughts that create limitation. but there comes a time when the cleaning must be complete, the mind must cease. ceasing simply means to stop conceptualizing in order to be what you are.

    What will do you to gain clarity in these matters?

     

    And not for nothing, but you are what you are regardless of thinking or not thinking. God is God, and God's thoughts are God's thoughts always. Even when that includes God thinking it isn't God.

  12. Posted

    2 minutes ago, JuliusCaesar said:

    superstimusly. 

    I can't find any dictionary reference for this term, so it would seem that I've accidentally invented a new word. So I'll define it below.

     

    Superstimusly, ADJ, of or pertaining to Supernormal stimulus or the quality thereof.

     

    For more information about Supernormal stimulus, please read the following Wikipaedia entry.

     

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernormal_stimulus

  13. Posted

    3 hours ago, RyanK said:

    You’re right.. I do know my body is just a concept and idea. But Leo talks about Actuality and direct experience being the only thing that exists. It seems like 5 minutes ago was actual, 5 minutes ago..but has now just become a concept and idea in this moment. 
     

    And to hopefully provide a higher degree of clarity, know that time is nonlinear, and every point in time is concurring simultaneously and superstimusly. 

  14. Posted · Edited by JuliusCaesar

    2 hours ago, RyanK said:

    But

    This word implies that in your understanding, there is a contradiction between the notion that body is merely thought and direct experience being all encompassing. This is incorrect.

     

    Let's take apart your statements so we know with what we're dealing. You mentioned "5 minutes ago", "was actual", and "direct experience". I'll define these things to the best of my ability currently.

     

    "5 minutes ago" is in reference your human entity's experience of some past perceived event. The fact that it was very recent in human terms is irrelevant. The bottom line is that this is in reference to the sphere you call Earth's spacetime continuum illusion. 

     

    "was actual" falls under the same analysis and general definition as the above.

     

    "Direct experience" refers to an individuated entity consciously observing a dream/reality or reality/dream. 

     

    Now I'll define a term I've used. "Thought"

     

    "Thought" refers to consciously rendered logical judgment(s) by an individuated entity. These may arise in the form of an idea(s), concept(s), or any other shape or form that can called a logical conclusion, or anything that is logical or truthful in any way shape or form. Which also includes anything that may be appear illogical or untruthful, as these are merely low-quality logical judgment decisions.

     

    Now I'll define "Individuated Entity".

     

    An individuated entity is the One Infinite Creator taking the form of a limited aspect of itself. Typically forgetting the true divine identity and reality, it bears. Some examples would be any single human you can think of, e.g., Julius Caesar, Leo Gura, Donald Trump etc.

     

    Because it is possible even for human entities to manipulate the physical environment by thought alone. It's clear then, solely on that basis that everything we as humans experience is merely a mental construct or in other words a thought. 

     

    Or in other words, that reality is a dream. Because reality is a dream, everything within reality is essentially a thought or thought form. Except for the self, because the Self is the Infinite Creator.

     

    Therefore, all of your direct experience is just thought of yours's you made yourself to forget that you ever thought it as the Infinite Creator. At least, this applies to most of human dreaming, there are instances of lucidity where the entity becomes aware in varying degree and extent that their mind created it all.

     

  15. Posted

    1 hour ago, vladorion said:

    So, raping thousands of women is what makes one an outstanding specimen in your eyes? Or is it something else?

    It is not necessarily clear that the man in question is in fact guilty of this. If we were to rule based on the ethics of his day and culture, it is certain that Genghis is innocent of the charge. If, however, we were to rule using the ethics of people living in the United States in the 21st century, then in all likelihood yes, some of his conduct would be viewed as rape. However, which ethical standard is the correct one? Which legal system is the correct one?

     

    You don't have Jurisdiction over 13th century Mongolians. Therefore, in our judgment you don't have any right to charge him with anything. Do you understand?

  16. Posted

    17 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

    any idea is toxic.

    If that is so, then you ought to forget the whole thing, as this notion itself is an idea. What if there are toxic and non-toxic thoughts and thought-forms?

     

    36 minutes ago, Moksha said:

    The most radical thing you can do is to Self-realize that you are here not to die but to enjoy this phenomenal moment, seeing through the dream-prism that you created.

    The essence of being is doing, not dying. So, this is very true.

     

  18. Posted

    27 minutes ago, Blackhawk said:

    Compared to what?

    Nothing and Everything.

     

    27 minutes ago, Blackhawk said:

    Isn't it all relative?

    The relative is absolute. 

     

    27 minutes ago, Blackhawk said:

    Maybe in comparison to a alien or something I'm a fly.

    Too general, you would need to be more specific to make that thought stream functional.

     

    28 minutes ago, Blackhawk said:

    I have already tried psychedelics..

    It seems these days everyone's tried psychedelics. But have you tried thought?

     

    29 minutes ago, Blackhawk said:

    Anything would be easier than what you suggested..

    Hence why I responded in a quasi-meme manner.

     

    29 minutes ago, Blackhawk said:

    Maybe in a future life.

    What if your current life is a future life? What then?

     

    11 minutes ago, Razard86 said:

    It will, but it seems he is looking for a direct path.

    What if the inverse of what you suggested is more direct? Who is to say whether turning yourself into nothing is easier than to turn yourself into everyone and everything?

     

    12 minutes ago, Razard86 said:

    All paths lead to truth inevitably because everything is truth

    Then truth loses all meaning and value. This is the burden of the price to be paid for clarity.

     

    13 minutes ago, Razard86 said:

    it's just in a dream of denial of what it is. 

    Is it truly denial? Or is it self-affirmation?

     

  20. Posted

    4 minutes ago, Razard86 said:

    Question your entire identity. Ever single thing you identity and ask yourself what it is. Just understand if you go deep enough you are going to die. Utterly and completely. This is dangerous work....it's your entire existence. Are you really okay with this process? Don't push further unless you don't care about anything buy the truth. If you still care about being safe and feeling good then completely ignore everything I just said.

    If truth is paradoxical, then why not try and do exactly the opposite of all that and see if it yields the desired effect?

     

    2 minutes ago, OBEler said:

    30 days of 5 meo Malt

    Suggestion brought to you by Leo is God, God is Leo Incorporated, thank you for your business, citizen.

  21. Posted

    6 minutes ago, Blackhawk said:

    How?

    Are you certain this is the appropriate inquiry? You don't want to make it more specific?

     

    8 minutes ago, Blackhawk said:

    I like that. I think that you are probably right.

    I'm a fucking fly who can do nothing.

    Nonsense. You are not fly, but man. Mankind is far more capable than any fly.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  23. Posted

    On 11/4/2022 at 8:51 AM, Kalki Avatar said:

    Blue has a special connection with turquoise. From spiritual ego to no ego.

    It's refreshing to see someone else made that connection other than me.

     

    On 11/4/2022 at 8:51 AM, Kalki Avatar said:

    Thats the whole gap game of orange, green and yellow. 

    The thing is, that there actually are "portals" between these and stage Turquoise. Because Orange and Yellow both strive for the truth and practical utility. As such, the more practical aspects of spirituality at times these individuals find attractive, and they then go and do spiritual work for that very purpose.

     

    Of course, this more so applies to Yellow than Orange as individuals at Stage Orange tend to lack the prerequisite open mindedness necessary to encourage such a thing.

     

    Green's way to Turquoise is more obvious, strong Greens tend to do psychedelics just as a part of their culture. And that stage Turquoise can be penetrated this way is essentially the rock around which this very forum revolves.

     

  24. Posted

    I care not what attainments others may have in the spiritual domain. However, I do care to know if I have certain attainments. So, I follow a simple methodology to determine whether or not I have succeeded. It's codified by the adage that "Truth is measured by efficacy." 

     

    If I want to know whether or not for instance, that I can divine the future in my dreams. I'll attempt to do it, and if I make accurate predictions then clearly, I have some kind of Siddhi under the Yogic definitions. If, however, the predictions are murky and maybe they come true in part but it's not certain that I had clarity in my predictions, then I'd rule that I'm somewhere between having the attainment and not.