vizual

Member Apolitical
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    1,302

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by vizual

  3. Posted · Edited by vizual

    7 minutes ago, somegirl said:

    Well, it is misogynystic view of thinking.


    Mysoginy is every attempt to put women "in their place" and make them feel bad, degrade them, insult them, for doing what male would be doing (but in men case, minus social judgement).

    What do we call men who sleep with +40 people? Male slut? Or a chad? Probably the latter.

    I mean; your comment is just full of assumptions. I don't respect a promiscuous man any more than a promiscuous woman. But I do recognize and respect people's freedom to live their live in any way as they like. I also respect it if a person becomes a pimp or a drug dealer, they are free to do so. But that doesn't mean I can't have my personal opinion on that lifestyle or the people that live that lifestyle.

    And that's kind of the problem of this forum. Leo Gura does neither respect the people that have a different opinion than him, nor does he respect the freedom of having a different opinion.

  4. Posted

    5 minutes ago, Michael Jackson said:

    It was not just that 1 thing. There were mutliple occasions where @vizual showed very strange views on politics / society in the political section where Leo had to interrupt.

    So I guess, the title is well deserved.

    I have an opinion on political issues yes. But I'm quite moderate in my views overall. The thing is; if you question Leo Gura's woke politics he will place you on his hit list.

    I remember a conversation with you where I said that a woman that has slept with 40+ men is slutty, which in my view is not an outrageous assesment. And I got points for that for apparent misogyny. If I look at Leo's post history in the Dating section I can dig up posts that are way more 'misogynistic' than that. But yeah, the hypocricy is real.

    1 hour ago, Kksd74628 said:

    @vizual

    Could you share link to that conversation with Leo so I could check the situation and give my own perspective of what happened :).

    Sorry mate, I can't access the politics section any more. And Leo also deleted several of my posts so I don't know if it's still up.

  6. Posted

    18 hours ago, Asayake said:

    I don't even like the fact that restrictions are being imposed on people with certain opinions. I don't have to agree with other people's opinions but how do I know they're the biased ones and I'm not? The label is even more stupid.

    Why are left wing opinions considered better than right wing opinions on the forums? They're both flawed stances and if you think otherwise look at how much destruction they both caused throughout history. And even if right wing or pro Russia opinions objectively were worse(or why else was this user made 'apolitical'?) someone needs to have the 'worse' opinion in every discussion or everyone just has the same opinion and then you might as well just delete the political subforum because there's no discussion to be had. If the user did actual misconduct a ban is warranted but it doesn't seem to me this is the case? I might be mistaken.

    I'm not pro-Russia nor far right. I'm a centrist, but that shouldn't matter in the case of a ban/restriction.

    I called Leo Gura out on conflating racism with benefits for handicapped people, which I thought was a very poor comparison and should not be used in the same sentence unless you explicitly explain the difference. In reaction to that he took measures against me saying only "high conscious" people are allowed on the political forum 9_9 Yeah, real high conscious stuff Leo.

    But anyway, Leo Gura hates me for some reason and he has radicalized the past couple of months if you haven't noticed

  9. Posted · Edited by vizual

    35 minutes ago, Truth-Seeker said:

    I can't tell if you are trolling or instigating an argument here out of thin air.

    Also, all Leo did was mention handicapped people as a marginalized community and a minority that suffers some inequality and suggested a rhetorical method for reparation/compensation to prove his point; the point being that Green tends to overcompensate in their correction of inequality and they do so by literally using inequality...

    Nowhere did he even mention black people in his response. And nowhere did anyone mention black people on this thread. And I can't even conceive of anyone who has began to genuinely enter stage green and understands the spiral to actually be racist in the traditional stage-blue (and under) sense of the word. 

    Racism is specifically mentioned in this thread. And usually when people speak about racism it is in regards to black people.

    And again; comparing racism to handicapped people is an extremely poor comparison. If he was trying to make a meta point he should have clarified further on that because the kind of marginalization handicapped people experience, and the kind that black people experience are vastly different.

    And further; it seems you are alluding to 'positive discrimination', which is of course also discrimination. Which, in a way, is even worse than 'negative discrimination' as the positive kind is mostly unconscious discrimination. They engage in racism, but aren't even aware they are doing so.

  14. Posted

    So you are arguing that everyone that is born with a defect had it coming to them, as they were terrible people in their supposed previous life. How do you know this?

    And then you go on a tangent that people should have a license to have children. And who will decide the prerequisites to have children? Is it you? I don't see how this relates in any way to your first supposition. Maybe you can explain that as well.

  15. Posted

     

    China is actively buying Western influencers to spread propagandic lies. It would be very foolish to think Russia doesn't do the same(Patrick Lancaster and Coach Red Pill for example). It's like the video says, these 'influencers' are probably paid a nice wad of cash and apparantly they have zero moral or ethical awareness to do whatever their bosses pay them. People should be extremely skeptical of pro-China and pro-Russia western influencers.

     

    To Leo Gura: This is not a conspiracy theory, stop censoring me. 

  18. Posted

    8 minutes ago, Hardkill said:

    You must be out of the loop. Trump would still lose the presidential election according to most polls. His rallies keep getting smaller and smaller. CPAC straws polls keep getting significantly smaller and smaller. Trump is getting to be a tiring shit show. 

    Ron DeSantis has certainly possible quite a serious threat for the country. However, I don't think that he has ever had that broad once in a generation legendary appeal like Ronald Reagan or Obama in 2008 had.

    According to the Harvard CAPS-Harris poll; Trump would beat Biden if voting was held today(April 2022)

    https://harvardharrispoll.com/

  19. Posted

    23 minutes ago, Hardkill said:

    Well, then like we're saying, if he comes back and makes a lot of trouble on Twitter again, then he'll be asking for a ban and perhaps even more legal trouble.

    Also, I am not sure if his return to twitter would help him with campaigning for another presidential run. I think Trump has really lost so much steam from the voters because of both how increasingly tired many of his current and former supporters have gotten with him. Also, he very likely will still never get back on the other big-tech platforms such as YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, or make any more posts on Google. Plus, his Truth Social platform has been failing hard.

    Trump would win the presidential election if it was held today. I would argue he is as popular as ever. Will he still be as popular in 2024? I don't know. Ron DeSantis is also gaining national popularity rapidly.

  24. Posted

    Will Smith got what he deserved. He literally walked on stage and punched another person in the face because he made an innocent joke about his wife. Smith was completely out of line, assaulting someone is not okay and he was lucky he wasn't removed from the ceremony and arrested. And the only reason he wasn't arrested is because of his pivileged status. If it was some nobody that walked on that stage and punched Chris Rock that dude would go to jail 100%.

     

  25. Posted

    48 minutes ago, Hardkill said:

     

    So, then how explain how and why the civil rights movements succeed with ending Jim Crow laws in the US and why the massive amounts of new beneficial social programs got passed during Lyndon B. Johnson's era? 

    What do you mean? Lyndon B Johnson had been a career politician for the best part of his adult life, he was as status quo as it gets. He wasn't some social revolutionary.

    Status quo =/= anti-change