Onemanwolfpac
Member-
Content count
357 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Onemanwolfpac
-
-
13 hours ago, DivineSoda said:Because the system wants chaos. With chaos comes opportunity for a new order. This is a deeper conversation than I can have here on these forums. But I agree with you, it's kinda messed up.
But not to worry. There is a higher order at play that we cannot see so easily. Don't take all this political circus too seriously. Go inward and discover what really matters ❤️
More messed up the close mindedness on the forums. Lots of parroting spiritual nonsense and victim mindset. Ya, i don't watch the news.
A crazy point, I honestly thought it was going to be a landslide victory given the economy BUT, a lot has changed. The WHO colluded with China, pandemic over the flu shutdown the economy. Now, we have the democratic party kneeling to a terrorist group.
I won't be shocked by any outcome at this point. All i know is that, business won't be stationed here and btc is going to skyrock given the civil insanity.
-
Dude, the economy shit the bed. The economy was turned off due to the flu and in a election cycle (conveniently). The path forward is uncertainty. It is irrelevant to be done since nobody is hiring. Maybe police lololol.
Child like curiosity is the key. Mine has twinkled in pandemic. I have my purpose going forward.
-
16 hours ago, Dumuzzi said:@Onemanwolfpac I have been in the state of No-Nogamy for years now, so I wouldn't know
I am actually really interested in this girl I met in Budapest, but she lives in another city, which is a pain...
I may have inadvertently worked a love spell on myself when I asked the Goddess to send someone my way, so I have only myself to blame if I fall for this one...
My main motivation with this thread is to help others who may struggle with romantic issues, that is after all Inanna's main area of speciality. I will be updating it as more info comes my way.
So, smash away. Let it be whatever it is. In EVERY scenario, you put some special snowflake Disney view on a girl, you will be in for a reality check. When you feel sexual tension, it means that you need to live your truth; put your self forward. Chat her up and let her know what is up. Invite her back for drinks.
-
On 23/06/2020 at 3:04 AM, Aquarius said:Hey guys.
I am unable to love anyone else than myself. And by myself I mean my EGO, not the True Self, which is God/Everything Real.
I feel scared that I will be scarred for life again like last time/ first time I fell in love. I still feel deeply for my first lover, but I repress it.
How do I fall in love "safely"?
I could help you out with that ?
Seriously. You mentioned that you dropped a perfect but boring dude. Shocking, monogamy and boring? Gtfo. I thought it was like the movies? Serious not serious.
Take your pick. Monogamy, marriage, routine = anti seductive. Nothing predicable is sexy. Dr phil date night + missionary once a year is not a good time.
You put on the damn big girl pants and you pursue the dude who will throw you over his shoulders, kick in your bedroom door, and ring your bell. Not a dead beat. Has a job. More importantly, has balls to really take his shot in this finite life.
Unpopular opinion but, promiscuity and pair bonding doesn't end well. I mentioned my buddy I refer to as playboy. He's run through hundreds of models and pageant winners. Many who aren't over him and compare every other men to him. He is the one who got away.
I remember a model and pageant winner chasing him throughout her teens and twenties. She is not a pageant winner anymore. She is not married and very bitter at life. The sandberg advice is what she followed and how did that workout?
If you want "love" and you are scared, sociopaths should be avoided. I am not that guy to love nor fix. I want fun and thrilled to pursue. I have no interest to settle down or get a dog. This is a unique time to be a bachelor.
What do you even want? All I want is fun. You sound like my clone about loving yourself. I have never loved anybody more than myself nor do I compromise my ambition nor life purpose. Unconditional love is a sham and a play at cuckoldry. Absolute nonsense.
Wants a bf lol so go get it!
-
It sells Hollywood movies and hallmark cards. I have no such idea of how it works. I have watched a playboy buddy "find god" and move on from the fuck boy lifestyle. Playboy was running through hundreds of models and pageant winners. Now, he wants a wife. He is telling me to clean up my act. I am reading Path to God by Ram Dass. At the part of the talk against a tantra.
I am reaching guys but, I don't get the concept of monogamy outside the monetary system. That and keeping order.
I think monogamy and marriage is lame. Its anti seductive and unattractive by metric of sloth. The majority of times, people are slobs, get fat, lazy, chest, divorce, and the hamster wheel of insanity. The stats from porn are married Christian men meaning no sex in the home.
I would say, its lame and overrated. Power to whoever can make it work. I get bored pretty often. I love the thrill and chase. That breach between stranger and no pants dance. More of the sort of party and fuck boy mistake before wanting to get out of dating.
I keep meeting girls post workout, post run or hike during pandemic. They are all bored and sick of pandemic and i am game.
If i was seeing someone, tantra would be a good experience.
-
Why am i hearing radio silence? If literal, this is terrorism. Of figuratively, its a stupid comment given that abundance of looting and rioting.
Regardless of politics, this is unacceptable. Sadly I see it getting worse before better.
This is appalling. I am happy to not live in these democratic states. Here's to hoping things get better. ?
-
9 hours ago, Dumuzzi said:I am starting this thread to help those that may have trouble attracting members of the opposite sex in general, an issue most of us would have struggled with during our lives. I am a heterosexual male, so I will be writing from that perspective for obvious reasons, but what I write here will obviously apply to anyone else that may want to attract a fellow soul into their lives for purposes of forming a lasting bond. My inspiration comes from the Goddess Inanna, who is the Sumerian Goddess of Love and War (two closely related topics, I think we can all agree) and so this thread will include advice given by her, an expert if there ever was one.
I reported on this forum a couple of weeks ago, that I have changed my intent in wanting to get back into dating again, or more accurately, to actually start dating for real, for the first time in my life, at 41, because I've never done this properly before, mostly due to a lack of interest in the opposite sex on my side. I did have some girlfriends, relationships and even one-night stands on occasion, but they were mostly incidental, not due to me actually going out and looking.
So, since I put out the intent that I want to attract and date girls and asked Inanna to help me out and send some girls my way, things started happening for me. A few weeks ago, the day after I put out the intent to attract girls, I was picked up by two Ukrainian girls in my local park and I started dating one of them. We've met a few times, but I wasn't sure if she was really the right fit for me, there are several things about her that would put me off dating her in a serious manner. So I thought to myself I should really try and meet other girls too, though I have done exactly zero to actually make it happen so far.
Today I was on a business trip to Budapest, which is a beautiful city, if you've ever been and is justifiably famous for its extremely attractive ladies. My very first girlfriend was a Jewish girl from these parts and she looked like a young, but buxom Catherine Zeta Jones and had the silky voice of Scarlett Johannsson, not to mention a killer sense of humour. Unfortunately, I was too young and inexperienced (we were both 18) to reel her in and we parted ways after a couple of months of dating, which I regret to this day. She would have made an excellent wife... But, I digress.
So, I was walking around the Jewish Quarter of Budapest, which is home to its famed ruin bars (I was looking for the one called Gozsdu), when I noticed two extremely attractive ladies on the other side of the road. I quickly crossed the street and took a closer look. They were both wearing hot pants, since it was quite a hot day and it really showed off their extremely attractive behinds.
I had no intention of actually talking to them, they simply piqued my interest, visually speaking. Once I took a good look, I thought I should overtake them and made a conscious effort not to look where my eyes would take me (which was hard, believe me) and I instead pretended to look above and over them at some shop window, deliberately ignoring them. One of the girls was actually talking to the other, when she noticed me NOT looking at them (which would have been hard even for the Mahatma, given how hot these girls were). She started staring at me and I deliberately ignored her gaze, but she was having none of it and actually started talking to me.
She told me that she was just telling her friend how beautiful she was and whether I agreed. I said of course I did and I complimented this other girl on her exotic looks. It turned out that she was Jewish-Gypsy-Polish-Eskimo, a probably unique combination in the whole world and she certainly looked every bit like she had inherited the best traits from all her different ancestors. If I had to describe her, she looked a bit like a cross between Lucy Liu and Nicole Scherzinger. I’m guessing she must be around 25. I remarked that I’m also part Polish and they both retorted that this must mean we were meant to be together. This must have been less than a minute into our conversation. Anyways, we ended up exchanging numbers and I will hit her up the next time I’m in Budapest, but I was blown away by how eager both girls looked to get to know me. As a rule, hot 25 year-olds don’t chat up average-looking 41-year olds, but this is the power of intention and energy at work.
During the evening, I’ve noticed several girls checking me out (again, I’m not particularly good-looking) or trying to establish eye contact. This girl, who first chatted me up, out of the blue, looked positively mesmerized. They both were. The very first Ukrainian girl I mentioned, was basically all over me after an hour and within three we were making out in a bar. I have heard that those that have reached a certain measure of self-realization were very attractive to the opposite sex, but it is the first time I really saw it in action and it was quite an extraordinary thing to see. These girls were not attracted to me as a pile of flesh and bones, which is admittedly a decidedly average sight, but it was obviously my calm, masculine energy that they wanted to absorb. My theory is that true masculine energy is in extremely short supply in the world these days, especially in overfeminised western societies and women crave to balance their own femininity by complementing it with the masculine energy of a man (or in some cases, a woman).
Anyway, there is a lot to unravel here and this intro is already long enough, but in subsequent posts I will try to give practical advice on how you can achieve the self-confidence and calm assuredness that other people are attracted to and how you can put out the right energy and intent, mostly by applying to the Goddess and unearthing your inner Divine Feminine essence (which applies to both men and women.
There's a good part in the Bhagavad Gita regarding duty and intent. The rest just is. I took a lot away from the passage and application of it in the real world. Solely, living and speaking my truth. I am younger then you but as a bachelor, I have found it fun to meet people especially as I get older. Its all a process. I don't know what the solution is but I am not fond to Dating apps which is essentially cuckoldry. I am reading Path to God by Ram Dass. I finished power of now. I learned tolle is married. I have no idea how people believe in monogamy. I know how to meet women and have fun. I don't know how people will settle down. I don't quite understand it. Anytime I make eye contact with a cute girl, i am on it. No hesitation. Why not? Adventure!
-
My understanding, marriage is on the decline since 150 years. I think it doesn’t matter about ethnicity but, people need to be smart. There's certain perspective solely based on culture. They may or may not be open to an alternative.
Ie seeing a girl who is all about protests and activist. I am smashing. Its fun but the clock is ticking down. This has a expiration date. From a clash of values. I dislike all that sjw crap or any victim status clout.
It won't stop me from having a good time. I just see that writing on the wall. It doesn't stop the no pants dance. I just know, that activist do nothing shtick will get on my last nerve and we'll go pur separate ways
Such is life.
-
7 minutes ago, louhad said:Lol, you have no idea how complex the issues you have brought up are. I don't think you are ready to seriously dissect and understand them. Good luck on your journey brother.
At least i have the balls to come at it head on.
Let's fix police but i hear radio silence regarding the issues i listed. BLM isn't talking about it.
UBI. Free money. Privilege. = lazy!
I do think the Asians are doing it right.
You too bro. Good luck on your path.
-
1 minute ago, Serotoninluv said:In the 1950s:
Inter-racial marriage was illegal.
Same-sex marriage was illegal.
Children were segregated into different schools based on race.
Do you think it’s a good idea to return to those aspects of the 1950s?
Your missing the forest for the trees.
Nuclear family was better off than before government handouts. More free money isn't the solution.
Better cops is great. You think more money fixes these communities? Move to Chicago or Detroit.
The longer people rely on the state, things won't change. Daddy government isn't your or my father. The Dems will not fix life for you or i nor republicans. The responsibility and sole ownership is on the individual to step up.
You went to the equality argument which is short of hitler and the nazis. Blonde hair and blue eyes. The nonsense about equality is a fallacy but it is that same authoritarian crap only more malevolent. It is combined with fuzzy bunnies and good feels. At what cost?
Should you be chop down from the knees so someone short can compete with you in the dating world? How do you fix iq? There's no metric or scientific data that shows how to. Mitigate being clinically retarded. How about sexual attractiveness? Should you or i be made to look the same in the argument of "fairness?"
AOC is a classic example. Can't pay rent but is in office. Something should be done by someone else. Not, she learned to code and risks everything in a tech startup. Steal other people's money by running to the government. There's no doing the work or playing to win. Its all. Handouts. Its parasitic.
Its not the solution. Life goes on. I don't and won't live on those areas. If i start a business, do i do so in a America that is promoting socialism and communist talking points? I take 100x the consequences or taxed into oblivion? Obv not.
More business is going elsewhere. And can you blame them?
-
55 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:By that logic you would really love it in Saudi Arabia.
It's easy to maintain a strong nuclear family with force and oppression. When a woman cannot even get a credit card or passport without her husband's approval, yeah, she will stay in the nuclear family. She has no viable alternative.
And Government replacing the fatherless homes and promote "proud single mother" rhetoric is a better alternative? No dice. The alternative now is to run to the state and we get more high crime democratic states. We have leaders here kneeling in cowardly fashion to blm. I guarantee sooner or later, racism is going to be leaked likely before the election. Jesus called out these frauds thousands of years ago. Virtue signaling isn't new.
How many looting and rioting are from single mom households? Since no fault divorce its been a abysmal nightmare for these communities but a huge cash grab. The same ones championing for minorities are out for personal gain and power.
Imagine, someone in office who was financially responsible? Can pay for rent. God forbid, learned to code. Started say, a tech company and donated THEIR MONEY to said charities.
Forced oppression has flipped. What's the divorce stats? How about when looking at gender? College educated? When we look at crime, the single biggest determining factor is fathers in homes. Talk about oppression.
You see these tall, physically (dare i say) masculine looking fellas but they act like women. No fathers. They have hissy fits. They throw tantrums. Entitled for give me. Not, do the work. Oppression in the form of servitude. Not ownership or responsibility ie pick a ideal mate, father, husband etc. Nit dead beat then cling to victim clout. No, run to the state. Print of resources.
The dave ramsey vid shows that example of sloth. Why work? Free money. When employers start to fire and hire new employees who will work, its more victim card.
There's ownership 8n police force agreeing to better service and training but the crime rate in the communities mostly democratic btw are pointing the finger. Victim status.
Welcome to the matrix. Champion the same people who will exploit you. You got cancel culture and fired for pointing out that truth.
That being, the individual not the state will fix things. Again, people won't do the work.
-
4 hours ago, Consept said:I see this point a lot that things were better for black people in the 50s, i think its come about from Trump and maga, but its a ridiculous statement, how could it be better for black people if there was segregation, redlining, no civil rights. You cant really have it both ways and assert that racism is better than before but then in the same breath say that we should go back to more racist times
Reading comprehension isn't your strength. Let me use bold.
NUCLEAR FAMILY WAS STRONGER IN THE 50S.
-
3 minutes ago, Serotoninluv said:You are over-estimating meritocracy and under-estimating inequality.
If we have a bag of seeds and half the seeds go into high quality fertile soil and half the seeds go into low quality clay soil, that inequality will have a profound impact on the growth of the plants. The seeds in the low quality clay soil are at a disadvantage. A system of meritocracy will give an advantage to the seeds in the high quality fertile soil.
Whats the alternative? Should we all be cut off by the knees so, we're all short? This is Darwin. Survival of the fittest. Mother nature doesn't give a shit. The fact we are here means, our genes won throughout history and replicated. Its not to say, things are perfect. My city is not burning down. I am not cheering on riots.
The onus is on the individual to stand on their two feet and make something of oneself. Run to the government and more of the same will happen. WHY? INTERVENTION IS THE PROBLEM. It coincides with victim cards.
Winners focus on winning.
-
3 minutes ago, Bodigger said:I understand what you are illustrating and I am working on this awareness. Thank you for pointing out these defects. However, I have witnessed the Left saying and advocating for things like gay marriage, and turning the other way on family matters for decades. Religion gets bashed as well, and they are advocates for family values. I am not religious, but I see value in what they support.
Imho, its worse. The amount of pushing it on children is disgusting. The weaponized false accusations of metoo who Biebs called out most recently, tranny story time with children, putting tran ideas onto children and or hormones? Government education slinging drugs on little boys before they had a chance to fully develop.
The intervention of affirmative action, status quo hiring, diversity hirings isn't helpful. It plays into the sense that someone is incapable with a lack of capacity otherwise which is racist. The bar being lowered for one community and raised for the Asian community. Blatant racism. How these institutions get away with it is appalling.
Jocko nailed a solution. More training. More time on scenarios something activists could do besides crying and rioting. I don't ever remember hearing Asians play the victim card regarding a long history of racism.
-
1 hour ago, Bodigger said:The bias is showing. This is not a conservative statement. It is, as Biden would say, "fact over truth".
Isn't this statement telling us what we need to work on? Educating police is great, but educating the people and helping them with gains of integrity will make immense improvement.
Great post.
The narrative is lazy. Orange man bad. Now, cops bad. Not, how about reform in crime areas? Its been over 60yrs of government freebies. And how's it working out?
When Japan had fucking atom bombs dropped, i didn't recall Japanese going craxy, flipping cars, and burning down their cities. Oh wait, they were in concentration camps. They lost land. They had lives ruined.
Has the government repaid these fuck ups in history? Irrelevant because of Asian socio-economic and academic excellence. Its not even a talking point.
How about the Chinese and historical racism and work on the railway? Historical racism in Hollywood which is hard left btw.
Education is key. The victim card is not. Imho, the government would have destroyed the Asian community by pumping in more intervention and money.
-
3 hours ago, Serotoninluv said:I don’t disagree with everything you write. Yet you seem to be locked into some conservative ideology. You can dwell within that ideology if you like or you can expand beyond it. If you want to expand beyond it, arguing for the ideology won’t help. As I previously suggested, I think listening to Giridharadas speak about economics and social structures would help to expand your view.
Also, you might be interested in reading up on the impacts of UBI programs around the world.
https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2020/2/19/21112570/universal-basic-income-ubi-map
Such UBI programs could be integrated with Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. For example, the lowest level is meeting one’s survival needs such as food, water and shelter. If these needs are met, would most people become lazy and avoid work? Or would most people move up to the next level up and actually be more productive? . . . As well, the question of wealth inequality arises. Is it best to store wealth in a billionaires 3rd yacht that he doesn’t even use? Or would it be better to inject that wealth into raising minimum wage for people struggling to get buy on two jobs?
I don't necessarily agree with conservatives entirely either. I'll steal JBP line and say, "British Liberal," or more moderate but, in the era of sjw, victim card, and simping to blm by businesses or Democrats kneeling. There's no proof but a leak of Bill Clinton saying Obama will be getting him his coffee. No doubt, there's racism in the party and yet, it is the party to always play that hand of cards. Its gross. Its something that pisses me off about the party because it eliminates conversation despite a lack of a argument. Its lazy.
Human nature evolved to preserve energy. UBI is sloth. Do nothing. Free money. The Ramsey Vid shows people making more than going to work. Clearly not a stem degree. If AI happened, doctors, surgeons, CPAs, engineers, tech and trades all got decimated, UBI would be a alternative to the new world. Not now.
You must acknowledge that, stressors like weight lifting, learning to code and others HELP build new pathways in the Brain. The alternative leads to sloth.
Inequality is a weak argument. How do you compensate competing with Lebron in NBA? How about sexual attractiveness? Talent or skill set? There's always going to be unfair comparisons? Should i hunch on dates because i am taller to it fair?
There's a tech lead manager at my gym. At gunpoint, he is forced to hire women regardless of whether or not they can code. This is stupid. When too much of the diversity and affirmative action despite lack of skill, talent or ability happens, you abandon ship. He is looking elsewhere for work a career because this is a sinking ship. It goes back into the wage gap myth.
My problem with the articles around the world for ubi is, its a globalist agenda. It is always a good indication of power and the narratives being sold. We don't get news. We get political ideology. If AI, i bring on UBI. Till then, it promotes sloth as the vid with Ramsey suggested.
-
No different here. You have people championing progressive and virtue signaling nonsense. Orange man bad. Victim card. Repeat!
As for Eckhart, the dude did the work. He is a best seller. He has a awesome but over priced retreat i would like to checkout. People live in whatever paradigm they so choose.
Choose your destiny! - Raiden (mkIII)
Unlike the norm of progressive, "someone not me, do the work," Eckhart did the work. I see no hypocrisy. No money is the root of evil. People think running to the government be it pandemic flu or single mom's, urban areas rather than solving problems.
Imagine, if mankind whimpered and cried victim card in the cave at the Don of time? People would be still in caves throwing feces at one another. Sadly, a lot of people still live like that.
-
4 minutes ago, Epikur said:@Onemanwolfpac
Yes I agree.
do you have a link? Seems like sleepy Eckhart is quite awake
Its the Saturday youtube podcast to promote his consciousness series. No clue on time stamp. Its over an hour. I think it's near the beginning but. Again, its over an hour.
I linked it i believe in the purpose sub.
-
3 hours ago, Serotoninluv said:You are not seeing nuances here. The “democratic state” position is too simplified. I’m not sure if you are from the United States, yet you don’t seem to have an understanding of how government works in the U.S. For example, I live in one of the states you would probably refer to as a “Democratic State with appalling crime”. I’m sure you would say the crime in Detroit is appalling and the riots in Grand Rapids was appalling. So, let’s walk through it. My state generally votes for a Democrat in presidential elections. The state also leans toward electing Democratic U.S. senators. So at the federal level, you would consider it a “democratic state”. However, the state level is very different. The state cycles back and forth between democratic and republican governors. However all the state legislatures are DOMINATED by republicans. They always have full control of all state legislatures. Both the state House and state Senate. At times, they have supermajorities and can override a governor veto. The state has been heavily gerrymandered to favor republicans. I live in a district that is centered two hours away from me on the other side of the state! The republicans drew a lil’ itty bitty line to pull some democrats in my old district into a safe republican district. So now, rather than the districts being split Dem and Rep, they are both Rep. . . As well, there is leadership at local levels, such as city councils and majors. So, is the “absurd crime” in my state because its a “Democratic State”?
Pinning blame on individuals such as “fatherless households” will not solve the larger problem. That is a lazy, myopic view. It is only one piece of a larger puzzle. If you want to deepen and expand your understanding, read a wider variety of sociology and political science, not just the stuff that supports your world view.
To say that “America was better of in the 1950s” is again a myopic conservative view. For example, go learn about the Jim Crow laws of that era.
In terms of “government handouts” and “socialism” you have a very contracted conservative view. If you would like to expand your understanding, I would recommend listening to Anand Giridharadas.
Is fatherless homes helping? Single moms? Abortion? What about murder within the community? It skyrocketed following the welfare state and government intervention. This is not to say, there's multifaceted problems. The community on a individual level is key. Where is blm on the above stats? Its a election cycle and magically the chaos ensues? Shocking!
Radio silence.
My point is that, the nuclear family was intact better in the 50s than the present day.
Not acknowledging the effects of fatherless homes replaced by government is the single biggest detriment. The stats are abysmal for crime in single mom households as well as abuse.
I saw the target burning down. Nobody had a stem degree. Not trades. The government isn't saving anybody.
This is sloth! This pandemic to me looks like a UBI trial run. More people reliant on government. People take the bait. Its a piss poor attempt to acquire power.
I don't see pandemic or this situation any different. The onus is on the individual to live the American dream. Not run to government. Its a waste of a life rather than going out to win. Learn to code. Get into a trade. Start a business. Be a engineer or accountant.
Free money and handouts be it student loans or any form not earned has consequences.
Wasn't the mayor of Chicago threatening people with jail time beforehand sneaking out to. A salon? Chicago is a distaste and crime ridden but she got a haircut as the people are in squalor?
A woman was arrested for opening her business. Jailed two days for working. The economy shutdown for the flu? Its the 19th damn iteration. We beat it 18 times but again, its a election cycle.
Orange man bad. Let's trash the economy. Now riots. The two are linked and i wont be shocked if we here where the trail of money is coming from.
I would welcome defund police in said areas. It would be. More dangerous than Haiti in less than 24hrs.
-
2 hours ago, Leo Gura said:This is so silly. Liberals are not pushing censorship. Your speech is still free, Green culture just now expects that your speech not be racist, sexist, nationalist, and excessively selfish.
There is more censorship of speech at stage Blue than at stage Green.
Twitter is a classic example.
I know orange man bad around here. Fact check links to cnn opinion piece. The deplatformed and censorship always falls on conservatives. Most recent was the Google censorship before walking it back in typical cowardice fashion.
Private business can do whatever they like BUT, they cannot hide behind the legal protection anymore following the last executive order. If they want to play the game of deplatformed and censorship yet let man hating or racist comments on whites, doxing conservatives, etc there must be fall out. Not responsibility for the users or is responsible. Must pick a lane. Its one of the annoying things about the left and many platforms. I avoid twitter. Eckhart Tolle called out twitter insanity last weekend.
Why can't I be Nationalist? I used Asians for example as a ideal culture. Nuclear family. Fathers in households instead of abortions and proud single mom. Academic excellence in stem not women's studies or gender studies. Take Japan for example. The country is very nationalist. The country preserves their culture as is their right. The country hasn't been plagued by gender politics and nonsense the way the west has. And yet, if you visit Japan, there's definitely some racism towards foreigners too especially if you are pursuing the girls.
Regardless of the color spirals, its evident in the left and as i pointed out, the crime rates by many democratic states is Unreal. I agree with reform and more training but, I also agree with these communities and democratic states reform. Clean up their act.
That's not what happens. The cycle is running out to government, the AOCs who cannot afford rent but wants to extract resources.
I want better police. I want better communities. A woman, white girl took a dump on a cop car. A keeper. Not serious. As gross as this is imagine the life and squalor that person lives under? The government is not going to fix It. It is again why i believe that the onus is on the individual first and the community second. Collectively, communities can make change.
The welfare state is growing. Its not making things better. @Leo Gura i pointed out several times, black celebrities cheering on riots from the white community. Obama is where?
Someone posted about the philosophical term for the situation and reverse psychology. It pisses me off that the discussion is cut off by the left because some moron yells racist and tries to get you fired. The paying homage and kneeling by the Democrats is pathetic. Its simping. Its thirsty but for votes.
-
On 22/06/2020 at 9:27 PM, Consept said:Forget the narrative, what im talking about is applying the law to everyone. If a civilian commits a crime (providing their not connected to the police or someone powerful) theyll get arrested if the evidence is there. If a police officer commits a crime he'll most likely get off, this is endemic in the police and its not to say police are bad, because its human nature to protect your 'tribe'. However their tribe is the only one that can be above the law of which they are supposed to uphold, and of course people are going to feel that that is unfair and so you will get the reaction from the public because people rightfully dont feel that the police are on their side or are there to help them, especially if they kill people illegally and get away with it. I mean its literally only 2 or 3 that get convicted despite 1000 shootings a year, 100 or so involving an unarmed suspect, i dont know how that can foster trust.
Better training is necessary but the elephant in the room is these democratic states full of crime.
Sources?
The video Leo posted shows stupidity. Assault and stun gun cops before getting killed. I don't know where the problem is? He assaulted and fired first what was deemed a deadly weapon.
The Floyd scenario is wrong. The riots are not an example of higher iq or consciousness.
? Happy i don't live there
Nor will. I ever.
On 22/06/2020 at 9:33 PM, Serotoninluv said:In terms of demographics, it’s not so much about “democratic states”. It’s more about rural vs urban and why uban areas are locally in democratic hands. For example, Georgia is conservative republican at the state level and very conservative republican in rural areas. Yet urban areas, like Atlanta, are democratic. Georgia has conservative republicans at the state level and more liberal democrats at the urban level.
Urban areas are liberal (democrats) than rural areas, because they are far more complex. Conservatives would be much worse in managing urban areas. It’s not fair to criticize urban problems as being democrat, since it would be worse under conservative (republican) management. There is a reason Trump’s rhetoric and actions are inflaming urban tensions. He has a conservative mindset of the 1960s and that isn’t going to work within urban areas in the 2020s.
It would be like a janitor criticizing a calculus professor when his student’s perform poorly on a national math exam. It could be that the calculus professor is average and needs improvement, yet it would be silly for a janitor to take over the job. For the calculus professor to improve, he needs constructive criticism from above, not from below.
That's more conjecture. The crime in democratic states is appalling. There's more "urban" areas not following the herd anymore. "Change!"
The stats speak for themselves. My position hasn't changed. I am. All for blm or anybody calling out cops killing. Let's go in on crime in these communities? Fatherless households. "proud single mom" rhetoric. Pump more government resources in the community which has the exact opposite side effect.
Going back to your 1960s comment, these communities were better off in the 1950s..before the welfare state and running to the government for free shit.
I saw Linsay Shepard ranted about racism in Canada to blacks and aboriginals. She needs a history lesson. The underground rail road led to freedom. Canada didn't have slavery but they had Japanese concentration camps. They blew up Chinese building the railroad. There is a lot of Asian racism in North America and yet, how are the Asian community doing? Academically? Socio-economic status? How is the abortion stat? Divorce rate? Proud single mom status?
Japan is a mostly Japanese country. Like 98% Japanese 2% other. The country had two fucking A bombs dropped. They are proud of their culture. Certain countries don't give a fuck about race baiting but preserve their culture.
My childhood friend is from Japan. He is/was a immigrant. He has excelled on work ethic and strong family values. The Asian culture is a good blueprint for many high crime areas.
I agree with @Leo Gura for the most part and only disagree on larger government and government intervention/welfare state.
There's a inversion going on. Liberals censorship and Conservatives pushing free speech. Pumping on more government resources will cause more problems as Naseem Taleb shows on his book Antifragile. You cannot be antifragile and seek handouts.
The topic pisses me off. I grew up in "urban areas." i got out. I busted my ass. No handouts. Many didn't. I ended up in a predominantly Asian area after. Abortion, single moms and fatherless homes were not existent.
8 hours ago, Consept said:Yeah didnt watch all of it but he makes some good points about training, definitely needs to be more. It would be hard to actually get numbers for how many officers dont report their colleagues, if they get away with it i dont know how that could be worked out. What you can see is the low conviction rate for offences by police officers, if the training is so poor it stands to reason theyd make a lot of mistakes. I can see how it would be difficult for officers to culpable if the training isnt sufficient, however if its things like shooting unarmed suspects i cant see the excuse for that, it does depend on the case but there are some serious problems there, even if we cant pinpoint the exact reason why
I heard about a similar culture problem in armed forces and corrections. The barrier needs to be raised in policing and in communities where crime is high. We can do better.
-
10 hours ago, Mind of a beast said:My domain of mastery is philosophy.
My life purpose is to transcend, transform people and raise their consciousness.
Now the domain of mastery and life purpose are clear , I have a new dilemma.
I want to spend every minute in the service of other human beings.
I am currently pursuing dermatology by studying its competitive exams.
Yesterday I came across Peter Singer who has written philosophy books ( which I also intend to write ) and contributed to social good by founding nonprofit organizations.
I want to do that. My primary goal is to write world class philosophy books.
My secondary goal is to do something good for society.
Then I stumbled upon 80000hours.org which focuses on careers doing good for society. It focuses on effective altruism.
Doing dermatology isn't that great for social good.
So I thought maybe I can become a programmer ( full stack web developer) and create softwares for nonprofit and for profits organisations who do good for society.
Con of being a programmer is that it can be mentally exhausting.
So can I get enough time for writing philosophy books ( which is already a huge exhausting task )and doing socially good by becoming a programmer?
Should I switch my career from doctor to programmer?
What is your age? I ask because med school is a long slog. You can have a outrageous debt. You can learn to code solo, community college, uni, coding bootcamp. Personally, I rather code but maybe medicine is your interest. Check free coding bootcamp YouTuber and udemy. Only you can decide but i am probably older than you.
-
10 hours ago, electroBeam said:The 2nd one complained that I wasn't masculine enough during sex, I
10 hours ago, electroBeam said:Lol. Mate, that's not good. My first question is, why date a masculine woman? I don't understand.
@Moon made me laugh with "practice being more masculine." my abs hurt now. Thanks for the lols.
-
2 hours ago, hoodrow trillson said:OP, you are 100% on the money. I posted something similar to this in another thread but no one listened lol. But what you describe IS truth in this illusory monkey on a rock experience. My confirmation stems from realizations of real life experiences, psychedelics (I could easily see the strings and how that all works, also going meta while on it even more clearly showed me), my own experience, my friends/acquaintances' experiences, etc.
It's a tough pill to swallow for the majority of men though, and yes I am saying I am good looking and tall. It's very easy. In a funny way, "incels" are the ones who have been yelling this stuff (or similar) from the mountains in what they call the 'blackpill'. Of course, once incels gained a substantial amount of traction and they had permeated internet culture, they were automatically labeled as bad people and shoved to the side as lepers.
It's tragic because they do cite scientific proof of this crap and it is true.
I found that your face is paramount to your social survival and ESPECIALLY sexual survival. Being a living, breathing piece and an article of reality--you're subjected to judgement based on your looks automatically without your doing. THIS is the bulk of the work that literally mostly out of your hands lmao. Your masculine core is the other facet but you'd have to be some extremely weird awkward guy to fuck it up.
It's very interesting seeing people on this forum deny this or not see they have a huge blindspot--similar to believing the "I" is real.
There's Butt hurt and bad genetics. I assume incel is that group. Its Darwinian in effect when you consider it. As for denial I wouldn't pay no mind. A girl was on a tangent about Unsure of which to feel bad for when killed; a cop or criminal. This is the sort of thing that you come across on a forum about spirituality. Try dating apps. It gets better. Serious. Not serious.
I still don't get the point of the thread. People can be stupid. Male or female. Sheeple.
in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
Posted
No. He outed the organisation as a terrorist group. The riots and looting is telling. The further issue is that intellectual dishonesty by not calling out the crime, murder, single moms, abortions, and a series of other things. What you are preaching leads to Nazis and war. Its unacceptable.