Yeah, it's radical. Some kind of alternative to Wall Street needs to be invented.
The whole point is to break up the consolidation of capital in the hands of a few elites. There need to be systems and laws that push capital downward to average people. One such principle might be that if you leave the company, you lose most of your stock to the guy who replaces you, and holding stock pays automatic dividends if your company makes profit, but only if you work within the company. As soon as you leave, the guy who takes your position gets it.
Passive sources of income need to be gradually eliminated. All passive income comes off the back of wage slaves.
Here are my favorite channels. I highlighted the very best ones.
Some channels are German. I included them anyways because they are just too good to ignore and I know there are some German speakers here.
Which ones do you follow?
About Society, Politics and Economics
About Science, Tech and Interesting Stuff
About Lifestyle, Career and Personal Finance
Charisma on Command
Investment Punk Academy (German)
Niko Rittenau (German)
Plant Based News
I disagree with a lot of people on this sub, but I agree that we are a part of god having a temporary human experience. That is how I define pantheism.
I was recently forced to attend a religious class, and had an argument with the pastor.
My arguments went as follows : Why would god be judgemental based on 1 morality out of the 100,000,000 moralities and enforce it on all of the universe? Furthermore, why would he send those who did not subscribe to his morality to hell?
The pastor's response : Everything is moral, even to say that you shouldn't be enforcing morality is moral, even running for your business is morality because you believe that is the good thing to do, a good thing for your freedom, life, and morality is the distinguishment between good or bad., everything you do is because you subconsciously believe it is good, so why would god not enforce his morality on the universe? Everything is done from an underlying morality, so why would the universe not enforce one universal morality? Even saying that god is having a temporary experience within itself is a morality, because it says that knowing itself is good, only in christianity there is a harsher judgement.
He also said : God does not send you to hell, he does not need to have a relationship with you, but he offers a relationship to you because he is so good, by not being a match to who god is you are single-handedly rupturing your relationship with him, just like a husband cheating on his wife will rupture his relationship with her, and that by turning away from god, you are making yourself unhappy which is hell, and hell is the choice to turn away from god and who god is.
Someone help me refuke that. What argument would debunk that? What is a good argument to debunk religion/show it's wrongs?
Is there any SOLID evidence that everything is a part of god having an experience within itself? Some have tried DMT, and said it made them more of a christian, some say they have seen jesus, others say they have seen buddha, others become pantheists after DMT, others became agnostics.
Is there solid provable evidence that we are a pa of god havign a human experience, because without proof we can assume that there is a giant crocodile defying laws of physics eating everyone up after death. What makes pantheism a more accurate option than christianity?
I honestly hate christianity, and hate that I got owned like that lol. This is the best sub for answers in terms of a pantheistic perspective.
Set aside all mental distractions and give your full attention to what's being pointed to here. Don't try to grasp intellectually what's being said,just listen to what's being pointed to. What is being pointed to, is behind the words. The words themselves,if you follow them, are to lead you to what's behind them. The present moment or "now" is a silent,still,emptiness. This emptiness is not what the mind imagines it to be. It is this emptiness, that allows the perfection to be perceived.Hence the paradox, in the emptiness is fullness..