Danioover9000

@Nemra What do you mean opposite ideologies? Why are you asking the OP in a false dichotomy framing here saying: 'If so, do you think other ideologies are relatively better? Or does Norway don't have them?' and framing it as either 'other ideologies are relatively better' versus 'does Norway don't have them?' when in reality there is way more than just framing it as only these 2 options for @Alexop to answer.

@Bobby_2021 This reminds me of the Indians who immigrated to Africa, developed the businesses there, and later displaced out due to collective jealousy and right wing sentiments:

@Dauntment Sure, but if this emphasis is not guaranteed to make me appreciate Leo's 'path', then was that an assumption on your part? What does your ability to blatantly and easily see the mechanisms, self-delusions, blind spots, pitfalls and mental traps have to do with the discussion between Andrew Tate and the therapist? What if this is paid by Andrew Tate and scripted, both are pretending to have a genuine conversation? After all this is the 2nd time they're talking, yet your lying detection abilities haven't picked up this possibility? What did Andrew Tate exactly say to the therapist's question of 'what are your weaknesses?'? Did Andrew Tate just give a character building statements first, like he does list some of his weaknesses and follows that up with what successes and achievements he had since? For example Andrew Tate talked about being poor one point and explained how being poor made him appreciate Is it really true that super successful people do miss the point? For example even spiritual masters like the Buddha and Osho were actually successful people that didn't miss the point. Sadhguru can also be categorized as super successful himself, so does this mean that all the spiritual masters I listed have missed the point if they're successful or have increasing success?

@Alexop Good question. If I'm pressured to answer and give a reasonable percentage, when the failure rate is between and above 40%-60%, and the economic failings have several cases where you can trace the failures back to state sponsored LGBTQ indoctrination in schools. When there's several cases with strong correlation and causation linking economic failings or other social areas to the state's gender point system is when I'd say it got too far. That's not to say they never should teach this say in high school-university, but again like Yin-Yang there's a balance there, too little and too much isn't good.

@Leo Gura And this is not mentioning all the drama BS Destiny engages in. He makes Joe Rogan and Tucker look sane.

@Alexop If that's true, then that's ridiculous coming from a nordic country.

@actuallyenlightened How is raising the minimum wage not a type of taxation? If unskilled immigration is a horrible idea, why are western countries in general, with liberty/democracy/individualism bias and multiculturalism continuing to support immigration, even if some immigrants are unskilled? Also if it's a bad idea then why don't you set up a training program for some of these unskilled immigrants? How is that ALWAYS been the case throughout history and the future? What if this history you sourced is white washed? What if in the future we face a nuclear war, would this be always the case during and after nuclear fallout? How does urbanization and religion contribute? Which economy are we talking about here? What does birthrate have to do with predatory capitalism? Do you mean 500 mil to 500 bil, in currency? How would such money ranges like that mean your lifestyle would be the same? If you won the lottery and won 10 million, would you still say your lifestyle would relatively be mostly the same, or would you invest in more commodities and goods, or invest in a better living location, and so on? Investing in industry /=/ better societies and is dependent on many factors. If I took your logic, then the slave industry is worth investing into because slavery is a better society. Same with child labor, same with predatory capitalisms toppling governments to install puppet rulers, same with exploitation of natural resources whilst toxicity in environment increases as a ramification, same with human sex trafficking in the black markets. Again it depends on what type of taxation here. Are we talking about corporate tax? Tariffs?

Interesting news! Comedian Baker gets backlash from telling a breastfeeding mother to leave: And IMMEDIATELY after watching this the first time I intuitively didn't trust what the comedian was saying, from how Barker introduces himself to the reporter felt manipulative and scripted between 1:09 to1:25, bunch of building rapport, band wagon and using words to try and get immediate friendliness from the news person like 'Carl my friend!' then arms spread wide and claps together like that is a bit manipulative. Body language: Generally a lot of hand illustrators and active hands from Barker, but micro expressions of distress/defensiveness in his face and head movement. From small smirks mid sentences like in 1:25(when one cheek small smiles or micro raises, that's typically feeling contempt or feeling both moral/intellectual superiority, which IMO in that moment due to the topic is a small red flag). Then after that baby joke sequence 1:27 tp 1:40 he's blink rate increased followed by left hand rubbing his nose(blink rate indicates increased thought processing here, and scratching/rubbing nose usually means feeling uncomfortable, nervousness and anxiety of what's said/did, which IMO here is Barker). Also moments of him mentioning the mother breastfeeding and the stories circulating is where you see his micro expression of small smirking, again feeling contempt and some moral/intellectual superiority here. Verbal and tonality: Very strange, mostly calm but artificially projected. I don't know but it's a mix of Australian and New York to me. My conclusion, and intuition, is that Barker here is mostly in PR damage control, trying to obfuscate from one issue of his audience and viewers online potentially accusing him of kicking the mother out because it's specifically the breastfeeding and not for the crying that could be disruptive, here the crying I could partly agree on. The fact that even he himself let slip out is a few male voices in the crowd yelling 'Rake off!' like...and this is my rapper dark side coming out...WTF are you on???Alcohol and high? OBVIOUSLY THAT COMMENT IS TARGETING THE MOTHER! And you as the comedian failed to crowd control the male voices on stage attacking her, it's so easy to crowd control for a comedian IMO that Barker SHOULD HAVE PUT DOWN THE VOICES WITH HUMOUR! You see enough good comedians that can handle heckles and put them down, so treat the male voices like hecklers and put them down and defend the mother.

This will be a big compilation of people to study from, to read their body language and tonality, and what they're saying and word choices versus what their tonality, face, eyes, mouth, head, shoulders, arms, neck, chest, tension, and even leg and feet position tell us, simplified as subconscious mind leaks of agreement or disagreement with what the conscious mind stated. Of course, ALL HUMAN BEINGS HAVE A BIAS, therefore there'll be some skewed interpretations from my part when I analyze and observe each person's communication to others here, as there's appeals and fallacies to logos as well as ethos and pathos that must be clearly stated. If objectivity and truth of logic and science was absolute, then I wouldn't be able to BS my way when I presented my English presentation back in college, of when I fudged and made up data points and statistics that sounded context appropriate but are made up BS and I got away with it because of how charming I presented myself. So, in this mega thread I'll post some videos and look for body signs of deception and defensiveness to a word choice, tonality, the interview/interrogation dynamics and framing, and optionally past contexts if I felt some partial truth was communicated, but needed more context. So, let's start with these two that I do admit liking, for their older content, but mixed feelings for their recent contents in YouTube, and both are in the Patrick Bet Dave podcast which has slight right wing biases, individualism, business man biases, and Libertarianism:

@Husseinisdoingfine Ukraine is fake rainbow colours from America democracy/individualism/liberty, while Russia is solid red/blue hues motherland.

@Leo Gura Destiny is not a demagogue, and has consistent and well reasoned positions like his pro Israeli position he sunk cost fallacy himself into? Lately he's engaging in very deep ad hoc post hoc way, especially deflecting when it comes to not defining what genocide or ethnic cleansing is and if it's occurring in Gaza. Destiny actually was not like this at least 5 years ago, in fact he argued against a Neo Nazi with a very similar Zionistic way of thinking by explaining to him what motivated reasoning is. The irony here is now Destiny has hemmed himself into this position and gone straight pro Israeli without considering the other side. Lately he has virtue signaled a more moderate take with the pro Palestinians but IMO damage is done and now he's entangled into the sunk cost fallacy he put himself in.

@zurew So Joe at least did push back Tucker, if he didn't push back enough? And what degree would you consider a good or bad push back?

@Leo Gura Not necessarily. Someone can also be both intelligent and wisdom with some demagoguery, for example the Buddha was apparently really good at debating and convincing even spiritual masters in different circles and is also spiritually talented. IMO he's both wisdom and charisma mixed together. But I agree Tucker's obviously a demagogue with little intelligence and self awareness. Just like Destiny Divorcelli.

@ivarmaya I think it's more the opportunist type rather than the achiever type. Opportunists, and to some degree impulsive types(Jane Loevinger 9 stages of ego development), have little to no moral qualms about taking advantage of situations and even people such that they benefit way more than the person, even if sometimes it's more harmful to them. The achiever type is more situated in SD stage orange with some blue and green values(Spiral Dynamics stages of development). while Andrew Tate, Patrick Bet Dave, and Elon Musk, even Jeff Basso exhibits similar to achiever types, they're actually opportunist types especially PBD and Andrew Tate which both LITERALLY are in podcasts 2-3 times in PBD. Elon Musk and most billionaire narcissists, will they are at opportunist stage sometimes, they still have to adhere to regulations by government and public demands and the whole capitalism principles, and their corporate bias and conformist environments do keep the more powerful in check more outright. This is why it's so important to study con artists and scammers, even cult leaders to know what psychological tricks they use so you don't fall for those psychological techniques yourself and spot scammers early. Based on SD stages of development, cognitive and moral development, personality types/traits, 9 stages of ego development, Architypes(Carl Jung), Integral Theory's other lines of development in life and societal domains(Ken Wilbur), ideological beliefs indoctrinated by culture/societal programing, metanarrative, information ecology, and biases that shapes our worldviews.

@ChadT I'm sure TYT, Majority Report, the Kyle Show, and maybe Pod Save America may covers this, maybe even Charisma on Command. IMO based on his body language and tonality, Joe Rogan actually gave some reasonable push back in his undertone and how he handles Tucker's framing. Even in the short you provided I can see Joe is handling him well enough, but not so aggressively pushing back that he'd appear crazy to part of Joe's anti mainstream and anti establishment biased people, mostly right wing but some moderates and left leaning people. I feel that Joe's careful enough here.

@DefinitelyNotARobot Little critique of your graph here is the genotype column, which should contain not masculine/feminine word, but male/female words instead. Male and female are words that are strictly defined to sex biology and male/female bodies mostly, with exception to intersex and androgyny/trans. This is important because if anyone does not define masculine/feminine words properly, and use masculine/feminine to refer traits, to energy, to vibe, to even nature of mind, and mix them with sex biology and traditional gender roles then massive confusion will happen.

@Basman True. Main difference with that not being a mental illness is the consequences of that label. If Transgender is considered a mental illness worldwide, then there's pressure to have institutions to house and treat such mental illnesses, which the traditionalists/conservatives are happy to try and actualize state wide. However, if Transgender is not a mental illness, and they still make institutes to house trans as mentally ill people, then just like with how the conservatives did the gay therapy conversions they'll try to do to Trans and eventually other LGBTQ groups. The real issue is what percentage is actually mentally ill versus not, and another issue is false conflation and generalization by right wing onto those minority groups.

@kray I agree, brainwashing kids that early is creepy. All they need to be taught at that age about gender and sex is fun bags are fun to play with, and real sword fighting is dangerous. Don't be obnoxious and demand others to call you whatever you want to be called, maybe drink more lactose free milk, eat a bit more veggies, do some martial arts, play dribbles with more fun bags, IDK be children instead of this ABC language fluidity of gender. Children need more orange juice and fluids that help their body and mind grow instead of fluid semantic games other adult children indoctrinating them can point to and feel false sense of achievement, the confusion they make is something to be proud of.

Good coverage of Oeen. Shame on Israel:

@Razard86 So what's a genius, and can everyone be a genius?

A great example of logic appealing and bias for objectivity and definitions: No, Art is both subjectivity and objectivity, so by extension music is both subjectivity and objectivity, so by extent all the sub categories within ART, and within MUSIC, for instance 'Rap Music' is BOTH OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE!! It's just such a I want to argue/debate this guy so badly that I can taste the flavors of the air around me. It's so annoying most people have this implicit appealing to logos, never mind ethos and pathos but logos, thinking the universality of logos prevails against all things.

@BlessedLion Yep.

@Scholar And the way to abolish factory farming is to accuse the employers/employees of wanting this to happen, implying intent that's malicious, and put moral blame on the owners, the CEOs, all the way down to the laborers working? @Scholar It's a straw man because you assume they are intentional in them creating a super virus and anti drug resistant bacteria, when in reality it's not that they are intentionally creating this situation when some need to live paycheck to paycheck up to the CEO types in denial of this. Most sides in this issue are deep in sunk cost fallacy and need to live.

@Vrubel Actually you don't have to be a Zionist Israeli to fight for your right to exist, just as the Americans didn't have to be Fascist/Nazi to fight off Nazi Germany. You are conflating both Zionist identity as being Israeli as if the 2 are 1 when that's purely false assome portions of Israel are not Zionist and are left leaning.

@hyruga And this is another argument point for vaccines, they at least ease the burden on the body's immune system and prepares it against the virus strain exposed to it so that any lingering side effects and stress form the real virus is reduced at least.